SHEAR-TYPE FRACTURE ORIENTATIONS AS AN INDICATOR OF THE PRINCIPAL STRESS AXES DIRECTION
https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2026-17-4-0909
EDN: ZWHFDB
Abstract
Most of the existing stress field reconstruction methods involve fracture systems to determine the stress state in a small-volume geomedium. The principal stress axes orientations at a point can be reconstructed from a pair of conjugate fractures. Based on mathematical modeling of compression stress field in the shear zone, this article shows that even when only one of two conjugate fracture systems develops and another one does not or is not being formed at all, the shears of the existing system are formed at an angle to the local maximum compression axis. Therefore, when the compression failure point is in the linear part of the Mohr diagram, the formation of even one shear gives a lot of information concerning local principal stress axes orientations at the formation point. This information can be used under rather restricted conditions – with knowledge about the intermediate principal stress axis orientation and the considered-volume medium location at the moment of shear formation, but all this can be obtained, for example, in physical modeling. Successive formation of shears allows for accurate monitoring of the variations in principal axes orientations irrespective of whether the precise shear angle is known.
About the Author
A. S. LermontovaRussian Federation
10-1 Bolshaya Gruzinskaya St, Moscow 123242
Competing Interests:
Автор заявляет об отсутствии конфликта интересов, связанного с этой рукописью.
References
1. Bornyakov S.A., 1981. Tectonophysical Analysis of the Process of Formation of the Transform Zone in an Elastic-Viscous Model. In: N.A. Logachev, S.I. Sherman (Eds), Problems of Fault Tectonics. Nauka, Novosibirsk, p. 26–44 (in Russian).
2. Bornyakov S.А., Seminsky К.Zh., Buddo V.Yu., Miroshnichenko А.I., Cheremnykh А.V., Cheremnykh А.S., Tarasova А.А., 2014. Main Regularities of Faulting in Lithosphere and Their Application (Based on Physical Modelling Results). Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 5 (4), 823–861 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2014-5-4-0159.
3. Frolova N.S., Korbutyak A.N., Mishakina A.A., Korpach S.V., 2016. Deformation Development in Shear Zones: The Results of Physical Modeling in Sand. In: Tectonophysics and Challenges in Earth Sciences. Proceedings of the Fourth Tectonophysical Conference in the IPE RAS (October 03–08, 2016). Vol. 2. IPE RAS, Moscow, p. 385–392 (in Russian).
4. Gintov O.B., 2005. Field Tectonophysics and Its Application in Studies of Deformation of the Earth’s Crust. Phoenix, Kiev, 572 p. (in Russian).
5. Gogonenkov G.N., Kashik A.S., Timurziev A.I., 2007. Horizontal Displacements of West Siberia’s Basement. Russian Oil and Gas Geology 3, 3–11 (in Russian).
6. Goncharov M.A., Rogozhin E.A., Frolova N.S., Rozhin P.N., Zakharov V.S., 2014. Riedel Megashears R’ and the Trend to Gravitational Equilibrium as Main Factors of Tsunamigenic Earthquakes. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 5 (4), 939–991 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/gt-2014-5-4-0164.
7. Gzovsky M.V., 1975. Fundamentals of Tectonophysics. Nauka, Moscow, 536 p. (in Russian).
8. Hancock P.L., 1985. Brittle Microtectonics: Principles and Practice. Journal of Structural Geology 7 (3–4), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(85)90048-3.
9. Karimova А.А., Bornyakov S.A., 2020. The Evolution of the Discontinuos Structure of the Shear Zone as a Periodic Process (Based on Physical Modeling). The Bulletin of Irutsk State University. Series Earth Sciences 33, 44–52 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3402.2020.33.44.
10. Korbutyak A.N., Frolova N.S., Mishakina A.A., 2018. Physical Modeling of Structuring in the Sedimentary Mantle Above a Basement Fault. Comparison with the En-Echelon Oiland-Gas-Bearing Swell-Like Upheavals in Northern West-Siberia Platform. Karotazhnik 3 (285), 57–67 (in Russian).
11. Leonov M.G., Morozov Yu.A., Stephanov Yu.P., Bakeev R.A., 2018. Zones of Concentrated Deformation (Flower Structures): Field Observations and Modeling Data. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 9 (3), 693–720 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2018-9-3-0368.
12. Lermontova A.S., 2021. Stress Field in a Shear Zone, and Formation of the Main Fault. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 12 (3), 499–507 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2021-12-3-0536.
13. Lermontova A.S., Rebetsky Yu.L., 2012. Research of Interactions Between Shear Fractures on the Basis of Approximate Analytical Elastic Solutions. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 3 (3), 239–274 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2012-3-3-0073.
14. Mikhailova A.V., 2007. Geodynamic Characteristics of Structures Formed in the Layer Above Active Faults in the Basement. In: Geophysics of the XXI Century: The Year of 2006. Proceedings of the Eighth Geophysical Readings Named after V.V. Fedynsky (March 02–04, 2006). GERS, Tver, p. 111–118 (in Russian).
15. Naylor M.A., Mandl G., Sijpesteijn C.H.K., 1986. Fault Geometries in Basement-Induced Wrench Faulting Under Different Initial Stress States. Journal of Structural Geology 8 (7), 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(86)90022-2.
16. Nikolaev P.N., 1977. Methods of Statistical Analysis of Fractures and Reconstruction of Tectonic Stresses. Proceedings of Higher Educational Establishments. Geology and Exploration 12, 103–115 (in Russian).
17. Osokina D.N., Fridman V.N., 1987. A Study of the Regularities in the Stress Field Structure near the Shear Fault with Friction Between the Sides. In: Stress and Strain Fields of the Earth’s Crust. Nauka, Moscow, p. 74−119 (in Russian).
18. Panteleev I.A., Lozhkin D.V., Lyakhovsky V.A. 2024. Orientation of the Localized Damage Zone in a Brittle Solid Under True Triaxial Compression. Mechanics of Solids. Т. 59. № 5. С. 2776–2788. https://doi.org/10.3103/s0025654422050107.
19. Panteleev I.A., Lyakhovsky V.A., 2022. Orientation of Fracture in a Brittle Solid Under Conventional Triaxial Compression. Mechanics of Solids 57 (5), 1016–1034. https://doi.org/10.3103/s0025654422050107.
20. Parfenov V.D., 1984. On Tectonophysical Analysis Method for Geological Structure. Geotectonics 1, 60–72 (in Russian).
21. Paul B., 1975. Macroscopic Criteria for Plastic Flow and Brittle Fracture. In: H. Liebowitz (Ed.), Fracture. An Advanced Treatise. Vol. 2. Mathematical Fundamentals. Mir, Moscow, p. 336–520 (in Russian).
22. Rebetsky Yu.L., Mikhailova A.V., Sim L.A., 2008. Fracture Structures at the Depths of Shear Zones. Tectonophysical Modeling Results. In: Problems of Tectonophysics. To the 40th Anniversary of M.V. Gzovsky Laboratory of Tectonophysics IPE RAS. IPE RAS Publishing House, Moscow, p. 103–140 (in Russian).
23. Rebetsky Yu.L., Sim L.A., Marinin A.V., 2017. From Slickenside to Tectonic Stresses. Techniques and Algorithms. GEOS, Moscow, 234 p. (in Russian).
24. Rzhevsky V.V., 1975. Physical and Technical Parameters of Rocks. Nauka, Moscow, 212 p. (in Russian).
25. Schulson E.M., 2004. Compressive Shear Faults Within Arctic Sea Ice: Fractures on Scales Large and Small. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 109 (С7), C07016. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC002108.
26. Seminsky K.Zh., 2003. Internal Structure of Continental Fault Zones. Tectonophysical Aspect. GEO, Novosibirsk, 244 p. (in Russian).
27. Sherman S.I., Bornyakov S.A., Buddo V.Yu., 1983. Areas of Dynamic Influence of Faults (Modelling Results). Nauka, Novosibirsk, 112 р. (in Russian).
28. Stefanov Yu.P., Bakeev R.A., 2015. Formation of Flower Structures in a Geological Layer at a Strike-slip Displacement in the Basement. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 51 (4), 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351315040114.
29. Stefanov Yu.P., Bakeev R.A., Rebetsky Yu.L., Kontorovich V.A., 2013. Structure and Formation Stages of a Fault Zone in a Geomedium Layer in Stick-Slip Displacement of the Base. Physical Mesomechanics 16 (5), 41–52 (in Russian).
30. Stoyanov S.S., 1977. Mechanism of Formation of Fault Zones. Nedra, Moscow, 144 p. (in Russian).
31. Tchalenko J.S., 1968. The Evolution of Kink-Bands and the Development of Compression Textures in Sheared Clays. Tectonophysics 6 (2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(68)90017-6.
32. Tchalenko J.S., 1970. Similarities Between Shear Zones of Different Magnitudes. GSA Bulletin 81 (6), 1625–1640. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1970)81[1625:SBSZOD]2.0.CO;2.
33. Tsytovich N.A., 1979. Mechanics of Grounds. Vysshaja Shkola, Moscow, 272 p. (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Lermontova A.S. SHEAR-TYPE FRACTURE ORIENTATIONS AS AN INDICATOR OF THE PRINCIPAL STRESS AXES DIRECTION. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2026;17(4):909. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2026-17-4-0909. EDN: ZWHFDB
JATS XML












































