ON ANISOTROPY OF THE EFFECTIVE CURRENT STRUCTURE IN THE PREPARATION ZONE FOR THE JULY 29, 2025, Mw 8.8 EARTHQUAKE OFF THE COAST OF KAMCHATKA
https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2026-17-3-0894
EDN: JNSTNM
Abstract
The present paper deals with the use of a probabilistic spectral analysis in the study of statistical properties of the variations in Z-component of electromagnetic field during 14 days prior to the July 29, 2025, M 8.8 earthquake which struck off Kamchatka. Additional analysis has been made on similar data for 9 days after the event. The analysis showed persistent differences in the statistical structure of geomagnetic variations at four spatially spaced magnitovariational stations. The persistence of differences is evidenced by the fact that they re-arise during the variation of processing parameters (N1, M, h). The results obtained are consistent with the model of directed (anisotropic) effective current structure forming in the earthquake preparation zone. A simple geometric assessment based on the Biot – Savart – Laplace Law yields angular orientations comparable with an axial direction of seismic zone. The revealed differences do not correlate with the level of moderate geomagnetic activity of the period considered and may reflect large-scale anisotropy of magnetic response in the pre-seismic interval. The proposed approach is oriented at the analysis of statistical structure of geomagnetic variations and can be used to identify spatial features of strong earthquake preparation process. Further testing of the method on independent events is required to assess its practical applicability.
About the Authors
A. E. VolvachRussian Federation
Katsiveli 298688, Republic of Crimea
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.
L. P. Kogan
Russian Federation
Katsiveli 298688, Republic of Crimea
65 Ilinskaya St, Nizhny Novgorod 603000
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.
L. N. Volvach
Russian Federation
Katsiveli 298688, Republic of Crimea
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.
V. B. Shtenberg
Russian Federation
65 Ilinskaya St, Nizhny Novgorod 603000
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.
E. A. Revunova
Russian Federation
65 Ilinskaya St, Nizhny Novgorod 603000
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.
References
1. Campbell W.H., 2003. Introduction to Geomagnetic Fields. Cambridge University Press, 303 p.
2. Freund F., 2002. Charge Generation and Propagation in Igneous Rocks. Journal of Geodynamics 33 (4–5), 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-3707(02)00015-7.
3. Freund F., 2011. Pre-Earthquake Signals: Underlying Physical Processes. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 41 (4–5), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.03.009.
4. Geller R.J., 1997. Earthquake Prediction: A Critical Review. Geophysical Journal International 131 (3), 425–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb06588.x.
5. Hayakawa M., 2015. Earthquake Prediction with Radio Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, Singapore, 294 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118770368.
6. Hayakawa M., Fujinawa Y., 1994. Electromagnetic Phenomena Related to Earthquake Prediction. Terra Scientific Publishing, Tokyo, Japan, 677 p.
7. Liu J.Y., 2009. Earthquake Precursors Observed in the Ionospheric F-Region. In: M. Hayakawa (Ed.), Electromagnetic Phenomena Associated with Earthquakes. Transworld Research Network, Trivandrum, p. 187–204.
8. Masci F., Thomas J., 2015. Are There Any New Findings in the Search for ULF Magnetic Precursors to Earthquakes? Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 120 (12), 10289–10304. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021336.
9. Masci F., Thomas J.N., Villani F., Secan J.A., Rivera N., 2015. On the Onset of Ionospheric Precursors 40 min Before Strong Earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 120 (2), 1383–1393. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020822.
10. Ouzounov D., Pulinets S., Hattori K., Taylor P. (Eds), 2018. Pre-Earthquake Processes: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Earthquake Prediction Studies. American Geophysical Union, 384 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119156949.
11. Pulinets S.A., Ouzounov D., 2011. Lithosphere – Atmosphere – Ionosphere Coupling (LAIC) Model – An Unified Concept for Earthquake Precursors Validation. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 41 (4–5), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.03.005.
12. Thomas J.N., Love J.J., Johnston M.J.S., 2009. On the Reported Magnetic Precursor of the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 173 (3–4), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2008.11.014.
13. Volvach A., Celik C., Kogan L., Volvach L., 2025a. On the Extreme Values of the Correlator of Topological Similarity of Functionals from the Statistics of Geomagnetic Field Measurements for Spatially Separated Magnetometers in the Period Before the 06/02/2023 Earthquake of Magnitude 7.8 in Eastern Turkey. Romanian Reports in Physics 77 (1), 704. https://doi.org/10.59277/RomRepPhys.2025.77.704.
14. Volvach A., Kogan L., Volvach L., Kanonidi K., Bubukin I., Revunova E., 2023. On the Topological Similarity of the Functionals from the Statistics of Magnetic Field Measurements Before the Earthquake on November 3, 2022 in the Gura Teghii, Romania Region. Romanian Reports in Physics 75 (4), 707. https://doi.org/10.59277/RomRepPhys.2023.75.707.
15. Volvach A.E., Kogan L.P., Kanonidi K.H., Bubukin I.T., Shtenberg V.B., Volvach L.N., Biazitov D.T., 2022а. Statistical Precursors of a Strong Earthquake on April 6, 2009 on the Apennine Peninsula. Heliyon 8 (8), e10200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10200.
16. Volvach A.E., Kogan L.P., Kanonidi K.H., Nadezhka L.I., Bubukin I.T., Boborikina O.V., Shtenberg V.B., Volvach L.N., Biazitov D.T., 2022b. A Possible Relationship Between the Sets of Quasi-Linear Local Trends Statistically Detected in the Variations of the Magnetic Field Parameters Before Earthquakes in Seismicly Active Zones of the Black Sea, Caucasus, and Western Asia. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 13 (5), 0680 (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2022-13-5-0680.
17. Volvach A.E., Kogan L.P., Kanonidi K.H., Nadezhka L.I., Bubukin I.T., Shtenberg V.B., Gordetsov A.S., Krasnikova O.V., Kislitsyn D.I., 2022с. Changes in the Properties of the Statistics of Physical and Biophysical Fields as Earthquake Precursor. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 108, 106200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.106200.
18. Volvach A.E., Kogan L.P., Volvach L.N., Kanonidi K.H., 2026. Precursors the Earthquake on February 6, 2023 on the Turkey. Natural Hazards 122 (2), 68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07754-7.
19. Volvach A.E., Kogan L.P., Volvach L.N., Kanonidi K.Н., Bubukin I.T., Shtenberg V.В., 2024. The Group of Statistical Precursors of 7.3 and 6.6 Magnitude Earthquakes in the Region of Indonesia. Natural Hazards 120 (6), 5601–5616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06439-x.
20. Volvach A.E., Kurbasova G.S., Volvach L.N., 2025b. Parametric Resonance of Surface Geomagnetic Waves as a Precursor of Local Earthquakes. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 137, 103802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2024.103802.
Review
For citations:
Volvach A.E., Kogan L.P., Volvach L.N., Shtenberg V.B., Revunova E.A. ON ANISOTROPY OF THE EFFECTIVE CURRENT STRUCTURE IN THE PREPARATION ZONE FOR THE JULY 29, 2025, Mw 8.8 EARTHQUAKE OFF THE COAST OF KAMCHATKA. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2026;17(3):894. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2026-17-3-0894. EDN: JNSTNM
JATS XML












































