THE APPLICATION OF SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY USING ENERGY- AND WAVELENGTH DISPERSIVE SPECTROMETERS FOR CHEMICAL DATING OF URANIUM MINERALIZATION ON THE EXAMPLE OF CARBONACEOUS SHALES OF THE DABANZHALGA SUITE (EAST SAYAN)

On the one hand, the widespread use of electron microprobe analysis in the version of a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) and, on the other hand, the comparability of the metrological characteristics of the EDS and wavelength dispersive spectrometry (WDS) in the case of determining the major components of minerals are a favourable background for investigating the possibility of using SEM-EDS for chemical dating of uranium mineralization. Carbonaceous-siliceous formations of the Dabanzhalga suite are widespread in carbonate deposits of the Lower Paleozoic in the Oka structural-formational zone of the East Sayan and represent deep-water deposits of the back-arc basin. All varieties of carbonaceous-siliceous rocks of the Dabanzhalga suite are characterized by increased U, Au, Ag, Pt, Pd, Mo, V, P, Cu. Their amounts are 5–10 times higher than those for other black shale deposits of the Eastern Sayan. Uranium forms its minerals – uraninite and brannerite, in association with carbonaceous matter and sulfides, and is also part of anhydrous phosphates – xenotime, monazite. The paper presents data on the composition and dating of brannerite and uraninite in samples of carbonaceous-siliceous shale sampled at three sites: Uber-Zhadoy, Deed-Khara-Zhalga and Erye-Khara-Zhalga. The obtained estimates of the isochronous dates of uraninite and brannerite grains for these areas are 523±26, 506±10, and 511±17 Ma, respectively. It was shown that these dates could be compared with the age of metamorphism at the Sukhoi Log deposit, estimated using modern methods of isotope geochronology. It should be noted that the average estimates of the dates of uraninite and brannerite in all studied areas of the Dabanzhalga suite are lower than the corresponding estimates of the isochronous date, which is probably due to the partial loss of radiogenic lead. For the Uber-Zhadoy site, a comparison of the EDS and WDS data was carried out, and it was shown that when using the EDS data, there is an underestimation of the Pb content in uraninite, and, as a consequence, an underestimation of the age of uraninite. 

1. Belyanin D.K., Karmanov N.S., Ayriyants E.V., Zhmodik S.M., Ponomarchuk V.A., 2016. Application of Scanning Electron Microscopy Using Energy- and Wave-Dispersive Spectrometers for Chemical Dating of Uranium-Thorium Mineralization. In: Radioactivity and Radioactive Elements in the Human Environment. Proceedings of the V International Conference (September 13–16, 2016). Publishing House of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, p. 116–120 (in Russian).

2. Distler V.V., Yudovskaya M.A., Mitrofanov G.L., Prokof’ev V.Yu., Lishnevskii E.N., 2004. Geology, Composition, and Genesis of the Sukhoi Log Noble Metals Deposit, Russia. Ore Geology Reviews 24 (1–2), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2003.08.007.

3. Holmes A., 1911. The Association of Lead with Uranium in Rock-Minerals, and Its Application to the Measurement of Geological Time. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 85 (578), 248–256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1911.0036.

4. Lavrent’ev Yu.G., Karmanov N.S., Usova L.V., 2015. Electron Probe Microanalysis of Minerals: Microanalyzer or Scanning Electron Microscope? Russian Geology and Geophysics 56 (8), 1154–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2015.07.006.

5. Meffre S., Large R.R., Scott R., Woodhead J., Chang Z., Gilbert S.E., Danyushevsky L.V., Maslennikov V., Hergt J.M., 2008. Age and Pyrite Pb-Isotopic Composition of the Giant Sukhoi Log Sediment-Hosted Gold Deposit, Russia. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 72 (9), 2377–2391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.03.005.

6. Mironov A.G., Zhmodik S.M., Ochirov Yu.Ch., Gurskaya L.I., Popov V.D., Sapozhnikov D.Yu., 2002. Black Shale Formations in the Sayan-Baikal Mountainous Province: Geochemistry, Metallogeny, and Geodynamic Environments. Russian Geology and Geophysics 43 (4), 364–381 (in Russian).

7. Montel J-M., Foret S., Veschambre M., Nicollet C., Provost A., 1996. Electron Microprobe Dating of Monazite. Chemical Geology 131 (1–4), 37–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(96)00024-1.

8. Newbury D.E., Ritchie N.W.M., 2013. Is Scanning Electron Microscopy / Energy Dispersive Spectrometry (SEM/EDS) Quantitative? Scanning 35 (3), 141–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fsca.21041.

9. Pyle J.M., Spear F.S., Wark D.A., Daniel C.G., Storm L.C., 2005. Contributions to Precision and Accuracy of Monazite Microprobe Ages. American Mineralogist 90 (4), 547–577. http://dx.doi.org/10.2138/am.2005.1340.

10. Suzuki K., Adachi M., Tanaka T., 1991. Middle Precambrian Provenance of Jurassic Sandstone in the Mino Terrane, Central Japan: Th-U-Total Pb Evidence from an Electron Microprobe Monazite Study. Sedimentary Geology 75 (1–2), 141–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(91)90055-I.

11. Suzuki K., Kato T., 2008. CHIME Dating of Monazite, Xenotime, Zircon and Polycrase: Protocol, Pitfalls and Chemical Criterion of Possibly Discordant Age Data. Gondwana Research 14 (4), 569–586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2008.01.005.

12. Votyakov S.L., Shchapova Yu.V., Hiller V.V., 2011. Crystal Chemistry and Physics of Radiation–Thermal Effects in U-Th-Containing Minerals as a Basis for Their Chemical Microprobe Dating. IGG UB RAS Publishing House, Еkaterinburg, 340 p. (in Russian).

13. Williams M.L., Jercinovic M.J., Goncalves P., Mahan K.H., 2006. Format and Philosophy for Collecting, Compiling, and Reporting Microprobe Monazite Ages. Chemical Geology 225 (1–2), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.07.024.

14. Yakubchuk A., Stein H., Wilde A., 2014. Results of Pilot Re–Os Dating of Sulfides from the Sukhoi Log and Olympiada Orogenic Gold Deposits, Russia. Ore Geology Reviews 59, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2013.12.003.

15. Yudovskaya M.A., Distler V.V., Prokofiev V.Yu., Akinfiev N.N., 2016. Gold Mineralisation and Orogenic Metamorphism in the Lena Province of Siberia as Assessed from Chertovo Koryto and Sukhoi Log Deposits. Geoscience Frontiers 7 (3), 453–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2015.07.010.

16. Zhmodik S.M., Mironov A.G., Belyanin D.K., Ayriyants E.V., Kiseleva O.N., 2014. Types of Carbonaceous Formations of the Southeastern Part of the Eastern Sayan. In: Noble, Rare and Radioactive Elements in Ore-Forming Systems. Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation Dedicated to the 120th Anniversary of the Birth of Corresponding Member of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Professor F.N. Shakhova (October 28–30, 2014). Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Novosibirsk, p. 239–244 (in Russian).