Preview

Geodynamics & Tectonophysics

Advanced search

STUDY OF SEISMIC EFFECTS ON CHANGES IN GROUNDWATER PRESSURE: EQUIPMENNT AND SOME WELL OBSERVASTION RESULTS FOR THE KAMCHATKA PENINSULA

https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2022-13-2-0594

Abstract

The relevance of the work is determined by the necessity to develop the hardware part of the seismic subsystem of the Large-Scale Research Facilities functioning at the Federal Research Center of the Geophysical Survey of the Russian Academy of Sciences to study seismic signals in groundwater pressure changes. For this purpose, the well monitoring on the territory of the Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky test site, Kamchatka Peninsula, was updated using Keller equipment, Switzerland (sensors of PAA36 XiW CTD Si, PAA36 XiW modifications, data logger GSM-2), Campbell Scientific Inc, USA (CR6 and CR1000 data loggers) and a budgetary hydrogeodynamic data recorder (HDDR) based on the STK-1 minicomputers, created at the Kamchatka Branch of the GS RAS. A description has been provided concerning the sets of digital equipment installed in four wells for precise recording of groundwater pressure variations with a frequency of 20.00–0.08 Hz. Consideration is being given to the characteristics of the equipment installed in individual wells and to the problems solved in the process of updating the well observation system in order to study vibration effects and hydrogeodynamic precursors of earthquakes. The paper presents the newly obtained results of recording the high-frequency variations in groundwater pressure in wells during the 2020–2021 local and remote earthquakes. A discussion is provided of new possibilities for studying vibration effects on changes in ground water pressure with a frequency comparable to the frequency of recording seismic events by seismometric equipment. Using a new equipment for recording water pressure in the unique well E-1 made it possible to record, a hydrogeodynamic precursor in real time before the March 16, 2021, Mw=6.6 earthquake which occurred at the epicentral distance of 350 km from the well.

About the Authors

S. V. Boldina
Kamchatka Branch of the Geophysical Survey, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

9 Piip Blvd, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky 683006

 



G. N. Kopylova
Kamchatka Branch of the Geophysical Survey, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

9 Piip Blvd, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky 683006

 



V. A. Kobzev
Kamchatka Branch of the Geophysical Survey, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

9 Piip Blvd, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky 683006

 



References

1. Barabanov V.L., Grinevsky A.O., Kissin I.G., Nikolaev A.V., 1987. On Some Aspects of the Effect of Seismic Vibrations on Water-Saturated Environment. Their Comparison with the Effects of Distant Large Earthquakes. Doklady of the USSR Academy of Sciences 207 (1), 52–56 (in Russian)

2. Boldina S.V., Kopylova G.N., 2017. Effects of the January 30, 2016, Mw=7.2 Zhupanovsky Earthquake on the Water Level Variations in Wells YuZ-5 and E-1 in Kamchatka. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 8 (4), 863–880 (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2017-8-4-0321.

3. Brodsky E.E., Roeloffs E., Woodcock D., Gall I., Manga M., 2003. A Mechanism for Sustained Groundwater Pressure Changes Induced by Distant Earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 108 (В8), 2390. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB002321.

4. Cooper H.H., Bredehoeft J.D., Papadopulos I.S., Bennet R.R., 1965. The Response of Well-Aquifer System to Seismic Waves. Journal of Geophysical Research 70 (16), 3915−3926. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i016p03915.

5. Kobzev V.A., Boldina S.V., Korkina G.M., Dolgikh V.P., 2021. Technical Support for KB GS RAS Well Equipment Updating in 2017–2020. In: The Problems of an Integrated Geophysical Monitoring of Seismically Active Areas. Proceedings of the Eighth All-Russia Scientific and Technical Conference with an International Participation (September 26 – October 2, 2021). Kamchatka Branch of the Geophysical Survey RAS, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, p. 396–400 (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.35540/903258-451.2021.8.75.

6. Kobzev V.A., Korkina G.M., 2021. An Experience in the Use of STK-1 Minicomputer for the Well Observations. In: The Problems of an Integrated Geophysical Monitoring of Seismically Active Areas. Proceedings of the Eighth All-Russia Scientific and Technical Conference with an International Participation (September 26 – October 2, 2021). Kamchatka Branch of the Geophysical Survey RAS, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, p. 401–404 (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.35540/903258-451.2021.8.76.

7. Kopylova G.N., Boldina S.V., 2007. The Response of Water Level in the YuZ-5 Well, Kamchatka to the Magnitude 9.3, Sumatra–Andaman Earthquake of December 26, 2004. Journal of Volcanology and Seismology 1 (5), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0742046307050041.

8. Kopylova G.N., Boldina S.V., 2012. On the Relationships of Water-Level Variations in the E-1 Well, Kamchatka to the 2008–2009 Resumption of Activity on Koryakskii Volcano and to Large (M≥5) Earthquakes. Journal of Volcanology and Seismology 6 (5), 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1134/S074204631205003X.

9. Kopylova G.N., Boldina S.V., 2019a. Hydrogeoseismological Research in Kamchatka: 1977–2017. Journal of Volcanology and Seismology 13 (2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1134/S074204631205003X.

10. Kopylova G.N., Boldina S.V., 2019b. Hydrogeoseismic Variations in Water Level of the Wells in Kamchatka. Kamchatpress, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, 144 p. (in Russian)

11. Kopylova G.N., Boldina S.V., 2020a. Effects of Seismic Waves in Water Level Changes in a Well: Empirical Data and Models. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 56 (4), 530–549. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351320030039.

12. Kopylova G.N., Boldina S.V., 2020b. Hydrogeological Earthquake Precursors: A Case Study from the Kamchatka Peninsula. Frontiers in Earth Science 8, 576017. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.576017.

13. Kopylova G.N., Boldina S.V., 2021. Hydrogeological Precursors of Earthquakes and Volcanic Activations According to Observation Data in Kamchatka Peninsula Wells. Earth Sciences and Subsoil Use 44 (2), 141–150 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21285/2686-9993-2021-44-2-141-150.

14. Kopylova G.N., Boldina S.V., Smirnov A.A., Chubarova E.G., 2017. Experience in Registration of Variations Caused by Strong Earthquakes in the Level and Physicochemical Parameters of Ground Waters in the Piezometric Wells: The Case of Kamchatka. Seismic Instruments 53, 286–295. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923917040065.

15. Roeloffs E.A., 1998. Persistent Water Level Changes in a Well near Parkfield, California, due to Local and Distant Earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 103 (B1), 869−889. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JB02335.

16. Wang Ch.-Y., Manga M., 2010. Earthquakes and Water. Vol. 114. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 225 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00810-8.

17. Wang Ch.-Y., Manga M., 2021. Water and Earthquakes. Springer, Switzerland, 387 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64308-9.


Review

For citations:


Boldina S.V., Kopylova G.N., Kobzev V.A. STUDY OF SEISMIC EFFECTS ON CHANGES IN GROUNDWATER PRESSURE: EQUIPMENNT AND SOME WELL OBSERVASTION RESULTS FOR THE KAMCHATKA PENINSULA. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2022;13(2):0594. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2022-13-2-0594

Views: 587


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-502X (Online)