Preview

Geodynamics & Tectonophysics

Advanced search

ANALYSIS OF THE SEISMIC AND IONOSPHERIC EFFECTS OF THE KUDARINSKY EARTHQUAKE ON DECEMBER 9, 2020

https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2022-13-2s-0622

Abstract

According to the data obtained on the equipment of the IEC SB RAS complex monitoring base for hazardous geological processes "Buguldeika" (Shared Research Facilities "Geodynamics and Geochronology" of IEC SB RAS) and Shared Research Facilities "Angara" of ISTP SB RAS an analysis of the characteristics of the Kudarinsky earthquake (09.12.2020) and the behaviour of the ionosphere during this event was carried out. The source parameters of the earthquake were obtained – the seismic moment of the earthquake (M0=3.02·1017 N·m), the moment magnitude (Mw=5.6), the source radius (2.43 km), and the stress drop (1.26 MPa).

The analysis of the ionosphere behaviour carried out using GPS/GLONASS receivers did not reveal disturbances caused by the Kudarinsky earthquake, which is most likely due to the relatively small magnitude of this earthquake. An analysis of the observation series related to the Kudarinsky earthquake showed the efficiency of using the Core Facilities Centre equipment and complex monitoring bases for studying seismicity, which is the most dangerous natural process for the Baikal region.

About the Authors

A. A. Dobrynina
Institute of the Earth’s Crust, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Geological Institute, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

128 Lermontov St, Irkutsk 664033;

6 Sakhyanova St, Ulan-Ude 670047, Republic of Buryatia



N. P. Perevalova
Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

126а Lermontov St, Irkutsk 664033



V. A. Sankov
Institute of the Earth’s Crust, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Irkutsk State University
Russian Federation

128 Lermontov St, Irkutsk 664033;

1 Karl Marx St, Irkutsk 664003



I. K. Edemsky
Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

126а Lermontov St, Irkutsk 664033



A. V. Lukhnev
Institute of the Earth’s Crust, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

128 Lermontov St, Irkutsk 664033



References

1. Afraimovich E.L., Palamartchouk K.S., Perevalova N.P., 1998. GPS Radio Interferometry of Travelling Ionospheric Disturbances. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 60 (12), 1205–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(98)00074-1.

2. Brune J.N., 1970. Tectonic Stress and the Spectra of Seismic Shear Waves from Earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research 75 (26), 4997–5009. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB075i026p04997.

3. Calais E., Minster J.B., 1995. GPS Detection of Ionospheric Perturbations Following the January 17, 1994, Northridge Earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters 22, 1045–1048. https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00168.

4. Dobrynina A.A., 2009. Source Parameters of the Earthquakes of the Baikal Rift System. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 45, 1093–1109. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351309120064.

5. Dobrynina A.A., Sankov V.A., Chechelnitsky V.V., Déverchère J., 2016. Spatial Changes of Seismic Attenuation and Multiscale Geological Heterogeneity in the Baikal Rift and Surroundings from Analysis of Coda Waves. Tectonophysics 675, 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2016.03.010.

6. Ishin A.B., Perevalova N.P., Voeykov S.V., Khakhinov V.V., 2017. First Results of Registering Ionospheric Disturbances Obtained with Sibnet Network of GNSS Receivers in Active Space Experiments. Solar-Terrestrial Physics 3 (4), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-34201708.

7. Jacobsen K.S., Dähnn M., 2014. Statistics of Ionospheric Disturbances and Their Correlation with GNSS Positioning Errors at High Latitudes. Journal of Space Weather Space Climate 4, A27. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2014024.

8. Perevalova N.P., Sankov V.A., Astafyeva E.I., Zhupityaeva А.S., 2014. Threshold Magnitude for Ionospheric TEC Response to Earthquakes. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 108, 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.12.014.

9. Tubanov Ts.A., Sanzhieva D.P.-D., Kobeleva E.A., Predein P.A., Tcydypova L.R., 2021. Kudarinsky Earthquake of 09.12.2020 (Mw=5.5) on Lake Baikal: Results of Instrumental and Macroseismic Observations. Questions of Engineering Seismology 48 (4), 32–47 (in Russian) DOI:10.21455/VIS2021/4-2.

10. Yasyukevich Yu.V., Vesnin A.M., Perevalova N.P., 2018. SibNet – Siberian Global Navigation Satellite System Network: Current State. Solar-Terrestrial Physics 4 (4), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-44201809.


Review

For citations:


Dobrynina A.A., Perevalova N.P., Sankov V.A., Edemsky I.K., Lukhnev A.V. ANALYSIS OF THE SEISMIC AND IONOSPHERIC EFFECTS OF THE KUDARINSKY EARTHQUAKE ON DECEMBER 9, 2020. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2022;13(2):0622. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2022-13-2s-0622

Views: 1271


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-502X (Online)