Preview

Geodynamics & Tectonophysics

Advanced search

DETAILED AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY OF COMPLEXLY DISLOCATED STRATA IN THE SUTAM TERRANE (ALDAN SHIELD) DURING STUDIES OF IRON-ORE DEPOSITS

https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2020-11-1-0468

Abstract

Magnetic exploration is the most informational and economical method of prospecting and exploration of iron-ore deposits. In rough-terrain and remote areas without any infrastructure, problems associated with ground-based methods can be avoided by using modern unmanned technologies that allow conducting geophysical surveys in a more efficient way. An unmanned aeromagnetic survey complex (aerial vehicle, UAV) Geoscan 401 was used to assess the possibility of using UAVs for aeromagnetic surveying of iron-ore deposits. Our experimental study was conducted in the well-studied area of the largest iron-ore deposit of South Yakutia. The UAV capacities were confirmed by comparing the aeromagnetic survey data with the available data obtained by ground magnetic exploration of the study area. By analysing magnetic fields, we established that the anomalies detected by the ground and aeromagnetic surveys were fully identical. Furthermore, a weak anomaly was discovered in the northeastern part of the study area (it was not reflected in the magnetic field from the ground survey data). Recalculation of the vertical gradient of the magnetic field shows that the anomaly is caused by a blind ore body. Its upper edge is located at a depth of 200–250 m from the day surface. In calculations for a data array without gradient intervals, a mean square error (MSE) amounts to 1.01 nT. An absolute error in the heights of the working and control flights did not exceed 1.5 m. Both the preliminary and control measurements were performed very efficiently. Profiles for UAV surveys were spaced by 100 m. A 1.0 km2 site was covered by one flight within approximately 20 minutes. The Geoskan-401 UAV is useful for obtaining orthophotos, topographic maps and 3D models of the surveyed territory as required for further studies consistent with the magnetic surveys. The aeromagnetic surveys were followed by trenching to verify the newly discovered anomalies. Based on the results of this experimental study, the forecast resources of the Sutam deposit should be increased by almost 250–350 million tons, i.e. plus 15 % to the previously explored and approved reserves of the Sutam field.

About the Authors

A. A. Syasko
LLC Neryungri Geophysics
Russian Federation

ANDREY A. SYASKO Candidate of Technical Sciences

41-2 Geologist Ave, Neryungri 678960, Russia



N. N. Grib
Technical Institute (branch) of M.K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation

NIKOLAI N. GRIB Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

16 Kravchenko St, Neryungri 678960, Russia



V. S. Imaev
Institute of the Earth’s Crust, Siberian Branch of RAS
Russian Federation

VALERY S. IMAEV Doctor of Geology and Mineralogy, Chief Researcher

128 Lermontov St, Irkutsk 664033, Russia



L. P. Imaeva
Institute of the Earth’s Crust, Siberian Branch of RAS
Russian Federation

LYUDMILA P. IMAEVA Candidate of Geology and Mineralogy, Senior Researcher

128 Lermontov St, Irkutsk 664033, Russia



I. I. Kolodeznikov
Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)
Russian Federation

IGOR I. KOLODEZNIKOV Doctor of Geology and Mineralogy, Professor

9 Lenin Ave, Yakusk 677007, Russia



References

1. Agisoft Metashape (PhotoScan) Pro 1.5.1, 2019. Available from: https://легион.net/agisoft-photoscan-pro-rus/ (Last accessed April 17, 2019).

2. Geoskan 401, 2019. Technical Specification. (in Russian) Available from: http://avia.pro/blog/geoskan-401-tehnicheskie-harakteristiki-foto (Last accessed May 7, 2019).

3. GeoSurvII, 2019. Available from: http://www.GeoSurvII.carleton.ca/mae/wp-content/uploads/UAV-Projects (Last accessed May 7, 2019).

4. Guidelines for Low-Altitude Aeromagnetic Survey, 2018. Moscow, 32 p. (in Russian)

5. Korotkov V.V., Glinskiy N.A., Kirsanov V.N., Kleper N.B., Kuznetsova A.V., Tsirel’ V.S., 2014. Measurements using unmanned aerial vehicles – a new stage of development of domestic aerogeophysics. Rossiiskii Geofizicheskii Zhurnal (Russian Geophysical Journal) (53–54), 122–125 (in Russian)

6. Li X., Li Y., Meng X., Zhang B., Guo Z., Zhu L., Qiao Y., 2011. A Three‐component Aeromagnetic Compensation for UAV Platform. In: International Workshop on Gravity, Electrical & Magnetic Methods and Their Applications (Beijing, China, October 10–13, 2011). Institution of Remote Sensing Application, Beijing, p. 66. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3659108.

7. Macnae J., 1995. Design specifications for a geophysical unmanned air vehicle assembly (GUAVAS). SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 14, 375–376. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1887449.

8. Magnetic Exploration Guide. Ground-Based Magnetic Survey, Aeromagnetic Survey, and Hydromagnetic Survey, 1981. Nedra, Leningrad, 263 p (in Russian)

9. Magnetometric Complex Geoscan, 2019 (in Russian) Available from: https://www.geoscan.aero.ru/services/aeromagnetic_survey (Last accessed April 17, 2019).

10. Martin P.G., Payton O.D., Fardoulis J.S., Richards D.A., Scott T.B., 2015. The use of unmanned aerial systems for the mapping of legacy uranium mines. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 143, 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.02.004.

11. Nikitin V.M., Kolodeznikov I.I., 2017. The role of iron ores of the Sutam region in the economic development of the eastern regions of South Yakutia and their characteristics. Nauka i Obrazovanie (Science and Education) (3), 64– 67 (in Russian)

12. Parfenov L.M., Kuzmin M.I. (Eds), 2001. Tectonics, Geodynamics and Metallogeny of the Territory of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). Nauka/Interperiodika, Moscow, 571 p. (in Russian)

13. Parshin A.V., 2015. Prospects for using unmanned aerial vehicles in geological exploration of ore objects in the Baikal mountain region. Voprosy Estestvoznania (Problems of Natural Sciences) (2), 97–101 (in Russian)

14. Parshin A.V., 2016. Complex for Unmanned Aeromagnetic Survey. RF Patent. Application No. 2016129683. Priority 19.07.2016 (in Russian)

15. Pirttijärvi M., 2015. Ryssänlampi magnetic survey using Radai UAV system and its comparison to airborne and ground magnetic data of GTK. Detailed Survey Report. Available from: http://tupa.gtk.fi/raportti/arkisto/30_2016.pdf (Last accessed May 7, 2019).

16. Semenova M.P., Tsirel V.S., 2016. Prospects for the development of unmanned airborne geophysics. Exploration and Protection of Subsoil (8), 34–39 (in Russian)

17. Syasko A.A., 2019. Application of the Geoscan 401 complex in aeromagnetic exploration (in Russian)

18. Tezkan B., Bergers R., Stoll J.B., Munch U., 2019. Electromagnetic measurement method using unmanned aerial system: Research project AIDA. Available from: http://www.geotechnologien.de/images/Documente/aida.pdf (Last accessed May 7, 2019).

19. Wood A., Cook I., Doyle B., Cunningham M., Samson C., 2016. Experimental aeromagnetic survey using an unmanned air system. The Leading Edge 35 (3), 270–273. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle35030270.1.


Review

For citations:


Syasko A.A., Grib N.N., Imaev V.S., Imaeva L.P., Kolodeznikov I.I. DETAILED AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY OF COMPLEXLY DISLOCATED STRATA IN THE SUTAM TERRANE (ALDAN SHIELD) DURING STUDIES OF IRON-ORE DEPOSITS. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2020;11(1):141-150. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2020-11-1-0468

Views: 1099


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-502X (Online)