Preview

Geodynamics & Tectonophysics

Advanced search

Geodynamic and hydrodynamic conditions of the Urna and Ust‐Tegus oil fields

https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2019-10-4-0455

Abstract

This paper discusses the productive beds of the Urna and Ust‐Tegus oil fields (West Siberia, Russian) and permeability and capacity properties that are influenced by geodynamic processes. Strong tectonic processes, accompanied by periodic magma intrusions, produced numerous fractures and faults in the Jurassic sediments, which act as conduits for groundwater flows, and thus led to the hydrothermal alteration of rocks and changes in the pore space. The data presented in the paper testify to the manifestation of these processes in the modern hydrogeochemical and geothermal conditions of the Jurassic‐Cretaceous sediments within the two oil fields and their vicinity. The petrophysical studies of the core samples and the hydrodynamic studies in the wells confirm that the reservoir properties of the productive strata are considerably heterogeneous. Despite the significant effect of the geodynamic factors, the analysis of the tracer data has not revealed any apparent spatial consistency of the presence (or absence) of a hydrodynamic connection between the wells and the locations of fractured and dynamically stressed zones. In our study, we have proposed and tested a method based on the analysis of morphotectonic features detectable in the depth maps of reference surfaces. This method is a useful additional tool for discovering and analyzing the relationships between the tectonic and hydrodynamic conditions of oil and gas fields.

About the Authors

A. R. Kurchikov
West Siberian Division of A.A. Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch of RAS; Tyumen Industrial University
Russian Federation

Doctor of Geology and Mineralogy, Professor, Corresponding member of RAS, Director, 74 Taymyrskaya street, Tyumen 625026;

38 Volodarsky street, Tyumen 625000



A. G. Plavnik
West Siberian Division of A.A. Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch of RAS; Tyumen Industrial University
Russian Federation

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Chief Researcher, 74 Taymyrskaya street, Tyumen 625026;

38 Volodarsky street, Tyumen 625000



D. A. Kurchikov
West Siberian Division of A.A. Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch of RAS; Tyumen Industrial University
Russian Federation

Candidate of Geology and Mineralogy, Researcher, 74 Taymyrskaya street, Tyumen 625026;

38 Volodarsky street, Tyumen 625000



References

1. Afonin D.G., 2008. Disjunctive deformations of the Jurassic complex and their impact on the development. Neftyanoye Khozyaystvo (Oil Industry) (9), 90–92 (in Russian).

2. Aplonov S.V., Keller M.B., Lebedev B.A., 2000. How much oil is left in the Russian subsoil? Priroda (Nature) (7), 35–42 (in Russian).

3. Baburin A.N., Zervando K.Yu., 2009. The block diagram of the reference reflecting horizon A (the surface of the pre‐ Jurassic basement). Tyumen Petroleum Research Center, Tyumen (in Russian).

4. Bagdasarova M.V., 2001. Features of fluid systems of zones of oil and gas accumulation and geodynamic types of oil and gas fields. Geologiya Nefti i Gaza (Oil and Gas Geology) (3), 50–56 (in Russian).

5. Bernabé Y., Mok U., Evans B., 2003. Permeability-porosity relationships in rocks subjected to various evolution processes. Pure and Applied Geophysics 160 (5–6), 937–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012574.

6. Florinsky I.V., 2016. Digital Terrain Analysis in Soil Science and Geology. Second edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 506 p. Huang Y., Zhou Z., Wang J., Chen Z., 2018. Investigation of the hydraulic connection between the upper storage reservoir and the underground powerhouse in the Hongping Pumped Storage Hydroelectric Powerstation. Environmental Earth Sciences 77 (5), 193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7357-y.

7. Jordán G., Meijninger B.M.L., Van Hinsbergen D.J.J., Meulenkamp J.E., Van Dijk P.M., 2005. Extraction of morphotectonic features from DEMs: Development and applications for study areas in Hungary and NW Greece. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 7 (3), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2005. 03.003.

8. Khasanov R.N., Lychagina L.A., Sudakova V.V., 2004. Simulation of geological objects of the Urnenskoye oil field based on a comprehensive analysis of seismic exploration and drilling materials. Bulletin of Subsoil User of the KhantyMansi Autonomous Okrug (15), 25–30 (in Russian).

9. Kurchikov A.R., Plavnik A.G., Itskovich M.V., Galkina N.Yu., Kurchikov D.A., 2013. Geodynamic processes effect on hydrogeochemical and geothermal conditions of Urnensky and Ust-Tegussky oil fields. Geology, Geophysics and Development of Oil and Gas Fields (6), 14–21 (in Russian).

10. Kurchikov A.R., Plavnik A.G., Kurchikov D.A., 2012. Manifestations of the active fluid-dynamic connection of the Jurassic and Paleozoic complexes of Western Siberia. In: Underground hydrosphere. Proceedings of the All-Russian Conference on Groundwaters of Eastern Russia. Institute of the Earth’s Crust SB RAS, Irkutsk, p. 102–106 (in Russian).

11. Kurchikov A.R., Plavnik A.G., Kurchikov D.A., Itskovich M.V., Galkina N.Y., 2012. Some specific features of filtrationvolumetric properties of collectors of Urnensky and Ust-Tegussky fields. Geology, Geophysics and Development of Oil and Gas Fields (9), 11–19 (in Russian).

12. Kurchikov A.R., Plavnik A.G., Kurchikov D.A., Yemel'yanov D.V., 2013. Features of the initial stage of development of the Urnensky and Ust-Tegussky oil fields. Izvestiya VUZov. Oil and Gas 3, 15–25 (in Russian).

13. Kurchikov D.A., Martynov O.S., Plavnik A.G., 2013. Some specific features of geodynamic conditions in Urnensky and Ust-Tegussky fields. Geology, Geophysics and Development of Oil and Gas Fields (11), 12–16 (in Russian).

14. Morad S., Al-Ramadan K., Ketzer J.M., De Ros L.F., 2010. The impact of diagenesis on the heterogeneity of sandstone reservoirs: A review of the role of depositional facies and sequence stratigraphy. AAPG Bulletin 94 (8), 1267–1309. https://doi.org/10.1306/04211009178.

15. Nedolivko N.M., Yezhova A.V., Perevertaylo T.G., Polumogina Ye.D., 2005. The role of disjunctive tectonics in the formation of void space in the reservoirs of the U13 stratum of the West-Moiseevsky section of the Dvurechensky oil field (Tomsk region). Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University 308 (5), 47–53 (in Russian).

16. Prokhorov A.Yu., Kurchikov A.R., Martynov O.S., Mitrofanov A.D., Korobeynikov A.A., Tryasin E.Yu., 2012. Determination of natural fracturing in the oil fields of the Latitudinal Ob on the basis of remote sensing data. Vesti Gazovoy Nauki (News of Gas Science) (1 (9)), 158–166 (in Russian).

17. Schuster V.L., 2010. Oil and gas potential of the Paleozoic basement of Western Siberia. Georesources, Geoenergy, Geopolitics (2), 1–20 (in Russian).

18. Shchetinina N.V., Khabarov A.V., Tsukanova E.F., 2012. Refinement of permeability of terrigenous-carbonate reservoirs of the Urnenskoe field. Neftyanoye Khozyaystvo (Oil Industry) (10), 21–23 (in Russian).

19. Shein V.S., 2007. Geodynamic analysis of oil and gas areas and waters in connection with the search for oil and gas. Geologiya Nefti i Gaza (Oil and Gas Geology) (2), 70–30 (in Russian).

20. Sidorov A.N., Plavnik A.G., Sidorov A.A., Shutov M.S., Stepanov A.V. et al., 2005. Certificate of registration of the GST program in the Computer Program Register of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks No. 2005612939 (in Russian).

21. Sulin V.A., 1948. The Formation Conditions, the Basis of Classification and Natural Waters Composition , in Particular the Oil Fields Waters. Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 108 p. (in Russian).

22. Taylor T.R., Giles M.R., Hathon L.A., Diggs T.N., Braunsdorf N.R., Birbiglia G.V., Kittridge M.G., Macaulay C.I., Espejo I.S., 2010. Sandstone diagenesis and reservoir quality prediction: Models, myths, and reality. AAPG Bulletin 94 (8), 1093–1132. https://doi.org/10.1306/04211009123.

23. Vakhromeev A.G., Sverkunov S.A., Ivanishin V.M., Razyapov R.K., Danilova E.M., 2017. Geodynamic aspects in the study of complex mining and geological conditions for drilling into oil-and-gas reservoirs in the Riphean carbonate rocks: an overview of the problem as exemplified by the deposits in the Baikit petroliferous district. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 8 (4), 903–921 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2017-8-4-0323.

24. Vashchenko L.F., Lichagina L.A., Khasanov R.N., 2005. Geological structure of the Urnenskoye field. Seismic Survey Technologies (3), 83–89 (in Russian).

25. Volobuyev E.A., Kudrin E.N., Prozorov S.V., Faybusovich Ya.E., 2003. Structural and geomorphological criteria of oil and gas potential of the southern Tyumen region. Bulletin of Subsoil User of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug (12), 1–6 (in Russian).

26. Wu Q., Xing L.T., Ye C.H., Liu Y.Z., 2011. The influences of coal mining on the large karst springs in North China. Environmental Earth Sciences 64 (6), 1513–1523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0376-y.

27. Yao M., Liu P., Shang M., Tao Y., Lei C., Cao L., 2016. Determining sources of mine water based on hydraulic characteristics analysis of a fault system. Environmental Earth Sciences 75 (10), 858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5660-z.


Review

For citations:


Kurchikov A.R., Plavnik A.G., Kurchikov D.A. Geodynamic and hydrodynamic conditions of the Urna and Ust‐Tegus oil fields. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2019;10(4):1011-1027. https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2019-10-4-0455

Views: 992


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-502X (Online)