EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL MODELING OF DIAMONDIFEROUS PLUMES

We consider thermochemical mantle plumes with thermal power 1.6·1010 W<N<2.7·1010 W (relative thermal power 1.15<Ka<1.9) as plumes with an intermediate thermal power. Such plumes are formed at the core–mantle boundary beneath cratons in the absence of horizontal free‐convection mantle flows beneath them, or in the presence of weak horizontal mantle flows. A proposed scheme of convection flows in the conduit of a plume with an intermediate thermal power is based on laboratory and theoretical modeling data. A plume ascends (melts out) from the coremantle boundary to critical depth xкр from which magma erupts on the Earth’s surface. The magmatic melt erupts from the plume conduit onto the surface through the eruption conduit. The latter forms under the effect of superlithostatic pressure on the plume roof. While the thickness of the block above the plume roof decreases to a critical value xкр, the shear stress on its cylindrical surface reaches a critical value (strength limit) τкр.Rock fails in the vicinity of the cylindrical block and, as a consequence, the eruption conduit is formed. We estimate the height of the eruption conduit and the time for the plume to ascent to the critical depth xкр. The volume of erupted melt is estimated for kinematic viscosity of melt =0.5–2 м2/с. The depth Δx from which the melt is transported to the surface is determined. Using the eruption volume, we obtain a relationship between the depth Δx and the plume conduit diameter for the above‐mentioned kinematic viscosities. In the case that the depth Δx is larger than 150 km, the melt from the plume conduit can transport diamonds to the Earth’s surface. Thus, the plumes with an intermediate thermal power are diamondiferous. The melt flow structure at the plume conduit/eruption conduit interface is determined on the basis of the laboratory modeling data. The photographs of the simulated flow were obtained. The flow line velocities were measured in the main cylindrical conduit (plume conduit) and at the main conduit/eruption conduit interface. A stagnant area is detected in the 'conduit wall/plume roof’ interface zone. The melt flow in the eruption conduit was analyzed as a turbulent flow in the straight cylindrical conduit with diameter dк. According to the experimental modeling and theoretical data, the superlithostatic pressure in the plume conduit is the sum of the frictional pressure drop and the increasing dynamic pressure in the eruption conduit. A relationship between the melt flow velocity in the eruption conduit and superlithostatic pressure has been derived.

1. Atikinson E., Pryde R., 2006. Seismic Investigation of Selected Kimberlite Pipes in the Buffalo Head Hills Kimberlite Field, North-Central Alberta. Alberta Energy and Utilities Board, EUB/AGS Special Report 079, 5 p.

2. Azhgirey G.D., 1956. Structural Geology. Moscow State University Publishing House, Moscow, 492 p. (in Russian)

3. Chalapathi Rao N.V., Lehmann B., 2011. Kimberlites, flood basalts and mantle plumes: New insights from the Deccan Large Igneous Province. Earth-Science Reviews 107 (3–4), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.04.003.

4. Davaille A., Limare A., Touitou F., Kumagai I., Vatteville J., 2011. Anatomy of a laminar starting thermal plume at high Prandtl number. Experiments in Fluids 50 (2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-0924-y.

5. Dawson J.B., 1980. Kimberlites and Their Xenoliths. Springer–Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg, 252 p. [Русский перевод: Доусон Дж. Кимберлиты и ксенолиты в них. М.: Мир, 1983. 300 с.].

6. Dobretsov N.L., Kirdyashkin A.A., Kirdyashkin A.G., Vernikovsky V.A., Gladkov I.N., 2008. Modelling of thermochemical plumes and implications for the origin of the Siberian traps. Lithos 100 (1–4), 66–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2007.06.025.

7. Dobretsov N.L., Kirdyashkin A.G., Kirdyashkin A.A., 2001. Deep-Level Geodynamics. Siberian Branch of RAS Publishing House, Geo Branch, Novosibirsk, 408 p. (in Russian)

8. Fedortchouk Y., Matveev S., Carlson J.A., 2010. H2O and CO2 in kimberlitic fluid as recorded by diamonds and olivines in several Ekati Diamond Mine kimberlites, Northwest Territories, Canada. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 289 (3–4), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.11.049.

9. Field M., Stiefenhofer J., Robey J., Kurszlaukis S., 2008. Kimberlite-hosted diamond deposits of southern Africa: A review. Ore Geology Reviews 34 (1–2), 33–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2007.11.002.

10. Gladkov I.N., Distanov V.E., Kirdyashkin A.A., Kirdyashkin A.G., 2012. Stability of a melt/solid interface with reference to a plume channel. Fluid Dynamics 47 (4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462812040023.

11. Jaques A.L., 1998. Kimberlite and lamproite diamond pipes. AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics 17 (4), 153–162.

12. Jaupart C., Mareschal J.-C., 2007. Heat flow and thermal structure of the lithosphere. In: G. Schubert (Ed.), Treatise on geophysics. Vol. 6. Crust and lithosphere dynamics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 217–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044452748-6.00104-8.

13. Jaupart C., Mareschal J.-C., 2014. Constraints on crustal heat production from heat flow data. In: H. Holland, K. Turekian (Eds.), Treatise on geochemistry (Second Edition). Vol. 4. The crust. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 53–73. https:// doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.00302-8.

14. Kaminski E., Jaupart C., 2003. Laminar starting plumes in high-Prandtl-number fluids. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 478, 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112002003233.

15. Kennedy C.S., Kennedy G.C., 1976. The equilibrium boundary between graphite and diamond. Journal of Geophysical Research 81 (14), 2467–2470. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB081i014p02467.

16. Kirdyashkin A.A., Dobretsov N.L., Kirdyashkin A.G., 2004. Thermochemical plumes. Geologiya i Geofizika (Russian Geology and Geophysics) 45 (9), 1005–1024.

17. Kirdyashkin A.A., Dobretsov N.L., Kirdyashkin A.G., 2009. Heat transfer between a thermochemical plume channel and the surrounding mantle in the presence of horizontal mantle flow. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 45 (8), 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351309080084.

18. Kirdyashkin A.A., Dobretsov N.L., Kirdyashkin A.G., Gladkov I.N., Surkov N.V., 2005. Hydrodynamic processes associated with plume rise and conditions for eruption conduit formation. Geologiya i Geofizika (Russian Geology and Geophysics) 46 (9), 869–885.

19. Kirdyashkin A.A., Kirdyashkin A.G., 2016. On thermochemical mantle plumes with an intermediate thermal power that erupt on the Earth’s surface. Geotectonics 50 (2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852116020059.

20. Kirdyashkin A.A., Kirdyashkin A.G., Distanov V.E., Gladkov I.N., 2016. Geodynamic regimes of thermochemical mantle plumes. Russian Geology and Geophysics 57 (6), 858–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2016.05.003.

21. Kirdyashkin A.G., Kirdyashkin A.A., 2018. Hydrodynamics and heat and mass transfer in mushroom-shaped heads of thermochemical plumes. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 9 (1), 263–286 (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2018-9-1-0348.

22. Kirdyashkin A.G., Kirdyashkin A.A., Gladkov I.N., Distanov V.E., 2012. Experimental modeling of the effect of relative thermal power on the shape of a plume conduit and the structure of free-convection flow in it. Russian Geology and Geophysics 53 (7) 689–697 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2012.05.007.

23. Kotelkin V.D., Lobkovskii L.I., 2011. Thermochemical theory of geodynamical evolution. Doklady Earth Sciences 438 (1), 622–626. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X11050333.

24. Kumagai I., Davaille A., Kurita K., 2007. On the fate of thermally buoyant mantle plumes at density interfaces. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 254 (1–2), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.11.029.

25. Lin S.-C., van Keken P.E., 2006. Dynamics of thermochemical plumes: 1. Plume formation and entrainment of a dense layer. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. 7 (2), Q02006. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC001071.

26. Olson P., Singer H. 1985. Creeping plumes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 158, 511–531. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112085002749.

27. Schlichting H., 1979. Boundary-Layer Theory. McGraw-Hill, 817 p.

28. Torsvik T.H., Burke K., Steinberger B., Webb S.J., Ashwal L.D., 2010. Diamonds sampled by plumes from the core–mantle boundary. Nature 466 (7304), 352–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09216.

29. Trubitsyn V.P., Kharybin E.V., 2010. Thermochemical mantle plumes. Doklady Earth Sciences 435 (2), 1656–1658. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X10120226.

30. Vatteville J., van Keken P.E., Limare A., Davaille A., 2009. Starting laminar plumes: Comparison of laboratory and numerical modeling. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 10 (12), Q12013. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GC002739.

31. Whitehead J.A., Luther D.S., 1975. Dynamics of laboratory diapir and plume models. Journal of Geophysical Research 80 (5), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB080i005p00705.

32. Yang T., Fu R., 2014. Thermochemical piles in the lowermost mantle and their evolution. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 236, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2014.04.006.

33. Zhong S., 2006. Constraints on thermochemical convection of the mantle from plume heat flux, plume excess temperature, and upper mantle temperature. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 111 (B4), B04409. https:// doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003972.