Evaluation of GPR capabilities in the study of seismogenic faulting and deformation in the bottom sediments of Lake Upoloksha (northeast of the Fennoscandian shield)
https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2018-9-4-0390
Abstract
The article describes the experience of using the GPR method to study the bottom sediments of Lake Upoloksha located in the Kola Peninsula, Russia. Such sediments are viewed as good archives of various Holocene geodynamic processes, including tectonic and paleoseismic events. This small lake is located in the zone of the active NW-striking lineament, which length is more than 20 km. A series of åsars (eskers) stretches along the lineament. In the previous studies, the bottom sediments of the lake were investigated by geological methods, including core sampling, lithological and micro-palaeontological analysis of sediments. The studies have revealed a horizon which features are indicative of catastrophic changes in the sedimentation conditions due to a single impact. Our study aimed at evaluating the level of informativeness of the GPR method for detecting disturbances in the bottom sediments and new paleoseismic dislocations. The study referred to the hypothesis of the distribution of seismic foci in the Kola Peninsula in the Holocene. A ground-penetrating radar OKO-2 and an antenna unit (150 MHz) were used to survey of Lake Upoloksha in detail. The positions of the main stratigraphic horizons of the bottom sediments were clarified, and their thicknesses were measured more precisely. The GPR measurement error in comparison to the drilling data did not exceed ±0.2 m, which corresponds to the resolution of the antenna used in the survey. The GPR data confirmed the existence of seismic dislocations identified by the geological methods and discovered new zones of displacement and deformation in the organogenic and mineral bottom sediments. The survey detected vertical displacements, which amplitudes vary from 1.3 to 1.7 m, and landslides caused by seismogravitational rock collapse. Based on the GPR data, a bathymetric map was constructed. It shows the positions of the two basins of Lake Upoloksha. The survey provided the basis for a model showing the isosurface of the top of the mineragenous sequence. In the central part of the mineral-base model, there is a series of individual stepwise blocks of the sublatitudinal strike, which result from seismic movements. The GPR survey of Lake Upoloksha demonstrates that the GPR method can be successfully applied to estimate the mineral and organogenic parts of the bottom sediments, study their lithostratigraphic features, and detect changes in the structure of the bottom sediments. Based on the GPR data, it becomes possible to map even the small-scale disturbances.
About the Authors
A. I. RodionovRussian Federation
Aleksander I. Rodionov - Post-Graduate Student, Junior Researcher.
11 Pushkinskaya street, Petrozavodsk 185910
S. B. Nikolaeva
Russian Federation
Svetlana B. Nikolaeva - Candidate of Geology and Mineralogy, Senior Researcher.
14 FersmanStreet, Apatity 184209
P. A. Ryazantsev
Russian Federation
Pavel A. Ryazantsev - Candidate of Geology and Mineralogy, Senior Researcher.
11 Pushkinskaya street, Petrozavodsk 185910
References
1. Bayer P., Huggenberger P., Renard P., Comunian A., 2011. Three-dimensional high resolution fluvio-glacial aquifer analog: Part 1: Field. Journal of Hydrology 405 (1–2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.038.
2. Bubeck A., Wilkinson M., Roberts G.P., Cowie P.A., McCaffrey K.J.W., Phillips R., Sammonds P., 2015. The tectonic geomorphology of bedrock scarps on active normal faults in the Italian Apennines mapped using combined ground penetrating radar and terrestrial laser scanning. Geomorphology 237, 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.03.011.
3. Busby J.P., Merritt J.W., 1999. Quaternary deformation mapping with ground penetrating radar. Journal of Applied Geophysics 41 (1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(98)00050-0.
4. Christie M., Tsoflias G.P., Stockli D.F., Black R., 2009. Assessing fault displacement and off-fault deformation in an extensional tectonic setting using 3-D ground-penetrating radar imaging. Journal of Applied Geophysics 68 (1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.10.013.
5. Daniels D.J., 2004. Ground Penetrating Radar. MPG Books Limited, Cornwall, 722 p.
6. Dentith M., O’Neill A., Clark D., 2010. Ground penetrating radar as a means of studying palaeofault scarps in a deeply weathered terrain, southwestern Western Australia. Journal of Applied Geophysics 72 (2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.07.005.
7. Ercoli M., Pauselli C., Frigeri A., Forte E., Federico C., 2013. Geophysical paleoseismology through high resolution GPR data: A case of shallow faulting imaging in Central Italy. Journal of Applied Geophysics 90, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.12.001.
8. Ercoli M., Pauselli C., Frigeri A., Forte E., Federico C., 2014. 3-D GPR data analysis for high-resolution imaging of shallow subsurface faults: the Mt Vettore case study (Central Apennines, Italy). Geophysical Journal International 198 (1), 609–621. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu156.
9. Evzerov V.Ya., Nikolaeva S.B., 2000. Belts of marginal glacial formations of the Kola region. Geomorfologiya (Geomorphology) (1), 61–73 (in Russian)
10. Fisher T.G., Jol H.M., Smith D.G., 1995. Ground-penetrating used to assess aggregate in catastrophic flood deposits, northeast Alberta, Canada. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 32 (5), 871–879. https://doi.org/10.1139/t95-083.
11. Gross R., Green A., Horstmeyer H., Holliger K., 2003. 3-D Georadar images of an active fault: efficient data acquisition, processing and interpretation strategies. Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications 4 (1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023059329899.
12. Jakobsen P.R., Overgaard T., 2002. Georadar facies and glaciotectonic structures in ice marginal deposits, northwest Zealand, Denmark. Quaternary Science Reviews 21 (8–9), 917–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(01)00045-2.
13. Jol H., 2009. Ground Penetrating Radar Theory and Applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 544 p.
14. Kovacs A., 1991. Impulse Radar Bathymetric Profiling in Weed-infested Fresh Water. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 19 p.
15. Lagerbäck R., 1990. Late Quaternary faulting and paleoseismicity in northern Fennoscandia, with particular reference to the Lansjärv area, northern Sweden. Geologiska Föreningen i Stockholm Förhandlingar 112 (4), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/11035899009452733.
16. Last W.M., Smol J.P. (Eds.), 2001. Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments. Volume 1: Basin Analysis, Coring, and Chronological Techniques. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 548 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47669-X.
17. Lukashov A.D., 1995. Paleoseismotectonics in the Northern Part of Lake Onega. Geological Survey of Finland, Nuclear Waste Disposal Research. Report Yst-90. Espoo, 36 p.
18. Lukashov A., Rukosuev S., 1997. The role of glaciotectonics in the formation of drumlins in Russian Karelia. In: R. Kujansuu, M. Saarnisto (Eds.), Contribution to the origin of Quaternary deposits and their resources in Finland and the northwestern part of the Russian Federation. Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper, vol. 24, p. 51–55.
19. Lunina O.V., Andreev A.V., Gladkov A.S., 2015. The 1950 Mw = 6.9 Mondy earthquake in southern East Siberia and associated deformations: facts and uncertainties. Journal of Seismology 19 (1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-014-9457-9.
20. Lunina O.V., Gladkov A.S., Gladkov A.A., Denisenko I.A., 2018. Srednekedrovaya paleoseismodislocation in the Baikal ridge: its structure and throws estimated from ground-penetrating radar data. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 9 (2), 531–555 (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2018-9-2-0360.
21. Maksimov D.A., Tolstobrov D.S., 2015. Georadar sounding in the complex of geological studies of the sedimentary deposits of the White Sea geoblock. In: Geotechnology and mineral processing. Materials of the 6th School of Young Scientists. Kola SC RAS, Apatity, p. 56–59 (in Russian)
22. Malovichko A.A., Sharov N.V., Shchukina Yu.K. ( Eds.), 2007. Earthquakes and Microseismicity in the Problems of Modern Geodynamics of the East European Platform. Book 1. Earthquakes. Publishing House of KarRC RAS, Petrozavodsk, 381 p. (in Russian)
23. McCalpin J.P. (Ed.), 2009. Paleoseismology. 2nd edition. Academic Press, New York, 629 p.
24. McClymont A.F., Green A.G., Kaiser A., Horstmeyer H., Langridge R., 2010. Shallow fault segmentation of the Alpine fault zone, New Zealand revealed from 2- and 3-D GPR surveying. Journal of Applied Geophysics 70 (4), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.08.003.
25. McClymont A.F., Green A.G., Villamor P., Horstmeyer H., Grass C., Nobes D.C., 2008. Characterization of the shallow structures of active fault zones using 3‐D ground‐penetrating radar data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 113 (B10), B10315. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005402.
26. Meyers R.A., Derald G., Harry M.J., Peterson C., Smith D., 1996. Evidence for eight great earthquake-subsidence events detected with ground-penetrating radar, Willapa barrier, Washington. Geology 24 (2), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0099:EFEGES>2.3.CO;2.
27. Mitrofanov F.P. (Ed.), 2001. Geological Map of the Kola Region. Scale 1:1000000. Publishing House of the Kola SC RAS, Apatity (in Russian)
28. Mörner N.A., 2004. Active faults and paleoseismicity in Fennoscandia, especially Sweden. Primary structures and secondary effects. Tectonophysics 380 (3–4), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2003.09.018.
29. Neal A., 2004. Ground-penetrating radar and its use in sedimentology: principles, problems and progress. Earth-Science Reviews 66 (3–4), 261–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2004.01.004.
30. Nikolaeva S.B., 2001. Paleoseismic features in the northeastern part of the Baltic Shield, and their geological and tectonic positions. Geomorfologiya (Geomorphology) (4), 66–74 (in Russian)
31. Nikolaeva S.B., Lavrova N.B., Denisov D.B., 2017. A catastrophic Holocene event in the lake bottom sediments of the Kola Region (Northeastern Fennoscandian Shield). Doklady Earth Sciences 473 (1), 308–312. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X17030072.
32. Nikolaeva S.B., Lavrova N.B., Denisov D.B., Tolstobrov D.S., 2016a. Traces of catastrophic processes in the lake bottom sediments at the western coast of the Babinskaya Imandra Lake (Kola region). Bulletin of the Russian Geographical Society 148 (4), 38–52 (in Russian)
33. Nikolaeva S.B., Nikonov A.A., Shvarev S.V., Rodkin M.V., 2016b. Comprehensive paleoseismic geological studies in a key site in Southwestern Kola Peninsula (northeast of the Fennoscandian Shield). Doklady Earth Sciences 469 (1), 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X16070138.
34. Omelyanenko A.V., Khristoforov I.I., 2012. Features of the GPR survey of the watered medium. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin (9), 127–132 (in Russian)
35. Overgaard T., Jakobsen P.R., 2001. Mapping of glaciotectonic deformation in an ice marginal environment with ground penetrating radar. Journal of Applied Geophysics 47 (3–4), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(01)00064-7.
36. Pasanen A., 2009. Radar stratigraphy of the glaciotectonically deformed deposits in the Isoniemi area, Haukipudas, Finland. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland 81 (1–2), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.17741/bgsf/81.1.002.
37. Reicherter K.R., Reiss S., 2001. The Carboneras Fault Zone (southeastern Spain) revisited with Ground Penetrating Radar – Quaternary structural styles from high-resolution images. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences – Geologie en Mijnbouw 80 (3–4), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016774600023799.
38. Sambuelli L., Bava S., 2012. Case study: A GPR survey on a morainic lake in northern Italy for bathymetry, water volume and sediment characterization. Journal of Applied Geophysics 81, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.09.016.
39. Sambuelli L., Calzoni C., Pesenti M., 2009. Waterborne GPR survey for estimating bottom-sediment variability: A survey on the Po River, Turin, Italy. Geophysics 74 (4), B95–B102. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3119262.
40. Schwamborn G.J., Dix J.K., Bull J.M., Rachold V., 2002. High-resolution seismic and ground penetrating radar-geophysical profiling of a thermokarst lake in the western Lena delta, northern Siberia. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 13 (4), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.430.
41. Shalaeva N.V., Starovoitov A.V., 2010. Fundamentals of Seismic Acoustics in Shallow Waters. Manual. Publishing House of the Moscow State University, Moscow, 256 p. (in Russian)
42. Shitov M.V., Biske G.S., Sumareva I.V., 2010. Late Holocene seismic event in the Southeastern Priladozhie. II. Parameters. Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Series 7: Geology, Geography (3), 18–28 (in Russian)
43. Shvarev S.V., 2003. Post-glaciation tectonic movements and the occurrence of the terraces of Lake Imandra (Kola Peninsula). Geomorfologiya (Geomorphology) (4), 97–104 (in Russian)
44. Smith C.A., Nyberg J., Bergman B., 2017. Comparison between hydroacoustical and terrestrial evidence of glacially induced faulting, Lake Voxsjon, Central Sweden. International Journal of Earth Sciences 107 (1), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-017-1479-4.
45. Starovoitov A.V., 2008. Interpretation of GPR data. Manual. Publishing House of the Moscow State University, Moscow, 192 p. (in Russian)
46. Starovoytov A.V., Tokarev M.Yu., Marchenko A.L., Subetto D.A., Rybalko A.E., Aleshin M.I., 2016. GPR potential when investigating quaternary deposits in lakes of Karelia // Transactions of Karelian Research Centre of RAS, Series Limnology, Oceanology (5), 62–75 (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.17076/lim268.
47. Tamura T., Murakami F., Nanayama F., Watanabe K., SaitoY., 2008. Ground-penetrating radar profiles of Holocene raised-beach deposits in the Kujukuri strand plain, Pacific coast of Eastern Japan. Marine Geology 248 (1–2), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2007.10.002.
48. Taraban’ko A.V., 2007. Application of the GPR for the study of seismic rupture generated during shallow intraplate earthquakes. Bulletin of Kamchatka Regional Association Educational-Scientific Center. Earth Sciences (1), 154–158 (in Russian)
49. Tronicke J., Villamor P., Green A.G., 2006. Detailed shallow geometry and vertical displacement estimates of the Maleme Fault Zone, New Zealand, using 2D and 3D georadar. Near Surface Geophysics 4 (3), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2005041.
50. Vladov M.L., Pyatilova A.M., 2009. Influence of the water layer upon the depth of ground radar investigations in freshwater reservoirs. Moscow University Geology Bulletin 64 (1), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0145875209010098.
51. Vladov M.L., Starovoitov A.V., 2004. Introduction to GPR. Manual. Publishing House of the Moscow State University, Moscow, 153 p. (in Russian)
52. Weill P., Tessier B., Mouaze D., Bonnot-Courtois C., Norgeot C., 2012. Shelly cheniers on a macrotidal flat (MontSaint-Michel bay, France) – internal architecture revealed by ground-penetrating radar. Sedimentary Geology 279, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2010.12.002.
53. Zykov D.S., 2001. Modern Geodynamics of the North Karelia Zone (Baltic Shield). GEOS, Moscow, 146 p. (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Rodionov A.I., Nikolaeva S.B., Ryazantsev P.A. Evaluation of GPR capabilities in the study of seismogenic faulting and deformation in the bottom sediments of Lake Upoloksha (northeast of the Fennoscandian shield). Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2018;9(4):1189-1203. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2018-9-4-0390