The recent tectonic stress field of the Amur region

The Amur region (Priamurie) is located in the NE part of the Amur lithospheric plate and its surrounding territories. Seismic activity is moderate in Priamurie, and the regional earthquakes, including the strongest ones, occur mainly in three seismic belts: Stanovoi (the zone of influence of the eastern flank of the Stanovoi fault), Yankan-Tukuringra-Soktakhan (the eastern flank of the Mongolia-Okhotsk lineament), and Turan-Selemzhinsky (from the Lesser Khingan to the north). The Sakhalin Branch of FRC GS RAS Catalogue of focal mechanisms of 57 regional earthquakes provide the data for a more precise estimation of the parameters of the crustal stress state in the study area. The Cataclastic Analysis Method (CAM) developed by Yu.L. Rebetsky (stage 1) was used to estimate the orientations of the main axes of the stress tensor and the Lode – Nadai coefficient. The analysis shows that the Upper Priamurie is dominated by shearing and compression with shearing. The Amur plate moves relative to the Aldan-Stanovoi block along the South Tukuringra and North Tukuringa faults to the east. Vertical shearing is predominant along the Dzheltulak fault and the western segment of the North Tukuringra fault. The NNE-trending compression takes place in the area located east of the quiescence zone of the Dzhagda ridge. Along the Mongolia-Okhotsk fault system, near the Sea of Okhotsk, the direction of compression changes to the northward one. The tectonic stress field along the Tanlu fault zone is inhomogeneous and comprises the alternating zones of horizontal compression and stretching with varying directions of the main stress axes. To the east of the band characterized by the maximum seismic activity, compression changes its direction to the southeast- and eastward. Probably, the impact of the oceanic subduction on the northern part of the Japan-Korean block begins to manifest itself in this part of the Amur region. The tectonic stress field reconstructed from the seismological data is consistent with the measurements of the modern crustal movements. The results of our study can prove useful for clarifying the tectonics of the region. 

1. Aptekman Zh.Ya., Zhelankina T.S., Keilis-Borok V.I., Pisarenko V.F., Poplavskaya L.N., Rudik M.I., Soloviev S.L., 1979. Computerized mass determination of earthquake focal mechanisms. In: V.I. Keilis-Borok (Ed.), Theory and analysis of seismological observations. Computational Seismology, vol. 12. Nauka, Moscow, p. 45–58 (in Russian).

2. Ashurkov S.V., San’kov V.A., Miroshnichenko A.I., Lukhnev A.V., Sorokin A.P., Serov M.A., Byzov L.M., 2011. GPS geodetic constraints on the kinematics of the Amurian Plate. Russian Geology and Geophysics 52 (2), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2010.12.017.

3. Ashurkov S.V., San’kov V.A., Serov M.A., Luk’yanov P.Y., Grib N.N., Bordonskii G.S., Dembelov M.G., 2016. Evaluation of present-day deformations in the Amurian Plate and its surroundings, based on GPS data. Russian Geology and Geophysics 57 (11), 1626–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2016.10.008.

4. Balakina L.M., 1972. Tsunami and the focal mechanisms of earthquakes in the northwestern part of the Pacific Ocean. In: Tsunami Waves. Proceedings of the Sakhalin Complex Scientific Research Institute, vol. 29. Sakhalin CSRI, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, p. 48–72 (in Russian).

5. Bird P., 2003. An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 4 (3), 1027. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000252.

6. Bouysse P., 2009. Geological Map of the World, scale 1:50000000. 3-rd edition. Commission for the Geological Map of the World, Paris.

7. DeMets C., Gordon R.G., Argus D.F., 2010. Geologically current plate motions. Geophysical Journal International 181 (1), 1–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04491.x.

8. Gatinsky Y.G., Rundquist D.V., 2004. Geodynamics of Eurasia: plate tectonics and block tectonics. Geotectonics 38 (1), 1–16.

9. Imaev V.S., Imaeva L.P., Kozmin B.M., Nikolaev V.V., Semenov R.M., 2003. Buffer seismogenic structures between the Eurasian and Amur lithospheric plates in the southern regions of Siberia. Tikhookeanskaya Geologiya 22 (6), 55–61 (in Russian).

10. Imaeva L.P., Imaev V.S., Koz’min B.M., 2012. Seismogeodynamics of the Aldan-Stanovoi block. Russian Journal of Pacific Geology 6 (1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819714012010071.

11. Konovalov A.V., Nagornykh T.V., Safonov D.A., 2014. Modern Studies of Earthquake Focal Mechanisms of the Sakhalin Island. Dal'nauka, Vladivostok, 252 p. (in Russian).

12. Levin B.V., Kim Chun Un, Nagornykh T.V., 2008. Seismicity of Primorie and Priamurie in 1888–2008. Vestnik FEB RAS (6), 16–22 (in Russian).

13. Logachev N.A. (Ed.), 1984. Geology and Seismicity of the BAM Zone. Neotectonics. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 207 p. (in Russian).

14. Malyshev Y.F., Podgornyi V.Y., Shevchenko B.F., Romanovskii N.P., Kaplun V.B., Gornov P.Y., 2007. Deep structure of the Amur lithospheric plate border zone. Russian Journal of Pacific Geology 1 (2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819714007020017.

15. Nikolaev V.V., Semenov R.M., Solonenko V.P., 1979. Seismogeology of the Mongolia-Okhotsk Lineament (Eastern Flank). Nauka, Novosibirsk, 113 p. (in Russian).

16. Parfenov L.M., Berzin N.A., Khanchuk A.I., Badarch G., Belichenko V.G., Bulgatov A.N., Dril S.I., Kirillova G.L., Kuzmin M.I., Nokleberg W.J., Prokopyev A.V., Timofeev V.F., Tomurtogoo O., Yang H., 2003. A model for formation of orogenic belts in Central and Northeast Asia. Tikhookeanskaya Geologiya 22 (6), 7–41 (in Russian).

17. Petit C., Fournier M., 2005. Present-day velocity and stress fields of the Amurian Plate from thin-shell finite-element modelling. Geophysical Journal International 160 (1), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02486.x.

18. Poplavskaya L.N., Bobkov A.O., Kuznetsova V.N., Nagornykh T.V., Rudik M.I., 1989. Principles of formation and content of algorithmic support for the regional seismological observation center (case of the Far East). In: N.V. Kondorskaya (Ed.), Seismological observations in the Far East of the USSR. Nauka, Moscow, p. 32-51 (in Russian).

19. Rebetskii Y.L., 2003. Development of the method of cataclastic analysis of shear fractures for tectonic stress estimation. Doklady Earth Sciences 388 (1), 72–76.

20. Rebetsky Y.L., 1999. Methods for reconstructing tectonic stresses and seismotectonic deformations based on the modern theory of plasticity. Doklady Earth Sciences 365 (3), 370–373.

21. Rebetsky Y.L., 2007. Tectonic Stresses and Strength of Rock Massifs. Akademkniga, Moscow, 406 p. (in Russian).

22. Rebetsky Y.L., Alekseev R.S. 2014. The field of recent tectonic stresses in Central and South-Eastern Asia. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 5 (1), 257–290 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2014-5-1-0127.

23. Rebetsky Y.L., Kuchai O.A., Marinin A.V., 2013. Stress state and deformation of the Earth’s crust in the Altai–Sayan mountain region. Russian Geology and Geophysics 54 (2), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2013.01.011.

24. Rebetsky Y.L., Polets A.Y., 2014. The state of stresses of the lithosphere in Japan before the catastrophic Tohoku earthquake of 11 March 2011. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 5 (2), 469–506 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2014-5-2-0137.

25. Safonov D.A., 2018. Seismic activity of the Amur and Primorye. Geosystems of Transition Zones 2 (2), 104–115 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.30730/2541-8912.2018.2.2.104-115.

26. Shatkov G.A., Volsky A.S. (Eds.), 2004. Tectonics, Deep Structure and Mineralogy of Priamurie and Adjacent Territories. VSEGEI Publishing House, Saint Petersburg, 190 c. (in Russian).

27. Solonenko V.P., Mandelbaum M.M. (Eds.), 1985. Geology and Seismicity of the BAM Zone. Seismogeology and Seismic Zoning. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 192 p. (in Russian).

28. Tataurova A.A., 2015. Stress and strain fields based on data on crustal earthquake mechanisms in Sakhalin Island. Bulletin of Kamchatka Regional Association Education-Science Centre. Earth Sciences (3), 92–101 (in Russian).

29. Wei D., Seno T., 1998. Determination of the Amurian plate motion. In: M.F.J. Flower, S.-L. Chung, C.-H. Lo, T.-Y. Lee (Eds.), Mantle dynamics and plate interactions in East Asia. AGU Geodynamics Series, vol. 27, p. 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1029/GD027p0337.

30. Yunga S.L., 1990. Methods and Results of Seismotectonic Deformation Study. Nauka, Moscow, 190 p. (in Russian).

31. Zonenshain L.P., Savostin L.A., 1981. Geodynamics of the Baikal rift zone and plate tectonics of Asia. Tectonophysics 76 (1–2), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(81)90251-1.

32. Zonenshain L.P., Savostin L.A., Misharina L.A., Solonenko N.V., 1979. Geodynamics of the Baikal rift zone and plate tectonics of the Inner Asia. In: A.S. Monin (Ed.), Geological-Geophysical and Underwater Studies of Lake Baikal. The USSR Acad. Sci., Moscow, p. 157–211 (in Russian).