Preview

Geodynamics & Tectonophysics

Advanced search

The 102–103° E geodivider in the modern lithosphere structure of Сentral Asia

https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2018-9-3-0380

Abstract

A quasi-linear zone of noticeable geological and geophysical changes, which coincides approximately with 102–103° E meridians, is termed by the authors as “geodivider”. Active submeridional faults are observed predominantly along the zone and coincide with its strike. Seismicity is most intensive in the central part of this zone, from the Lake Baikal to the Three Rivers Region at the Sino-Myanmar frontier. Transects with deep seismic sections and energy dissipation graphs show most sharply increasing seismic energy amounts and hypocenter depths in the western part of the geodivider which delimits (in the first approximation) the Central Asian and East Asian transitional zones between the North Eurasian, Indian and Pacific lithosphere plates. The transpression tectonic regime dominates west of the geodivider under the influence of the Hindustan Indentor pressure, and the transtension regime prevails east of it due to the Pacific subduction slab submergence and continuation. The regime change coincides with an abrupt increase in the crust thickness – from 35–40 km to 45–70 km – west of the geodivider, as reflected in the geophysical fields and metallogenic characteristics of the crust. The direction of P- and S-waves anisotropy together with the GPS data show decoupling layers of the crust and mantle in the southern part of the geodivider. According to our investigations, the 102–103° E geodivider is a regional geological-geophysical border that may be compared with the Tornquist Line, and, by its scale, with the Uralian and Appalachian fronts and some others large structures.

About the Authors

Yu. G. Gatinsky
V.I. Vernadsky State Geological Museum of RAS
Russian Federation

Yuri G. Gatinsky, Doctor of Geology and Mineralogy 

11 Mokhovaya street, building 11, Moscow 125009



T. V. Prokhorova
Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics RAS
Russian Federation

Tatiana V. Prokhorova 

84/32 Profsoyuznaya street, Moscow 117997



D. V. Rundquist
V.I. Vernadsky State Geological Museum of RAS
Russian Federation

Dmitriy V. Rundquist, Doctor of Geology and Mineralogy, Academician of RAS

11 Mokhovaya street, building 11, Moscow 125009



References

1. Artemjev M.E., Kaban M.K., Kucherinenko V.A., Demjanov G.V., Taranov V.A., 1994. Subcrustal density inhomogeneities of Northern Eurasia as derived from the gravity data and isostatic models of the lithosphere. Tectonophysics 240 (1–4), 248–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)90275-5.

2. Bonvalot S., Balmino G., Briais A., Kuhn M., Peyrefitte A., Vales N., Biancale R., Gabalda G., Moreaux G., Reinquin F., Sarrailh M., 2012. World Gravity Map. Scale 1:50000000. BGI-CGMW-CNES-IRD, Paris.

3. Chang L.-J., Ding Z.-F., Wang Ch.-Yo., 2015. Upper mantle anisotropy beneath the southern segment of North-South tectonic belt, China. Chinese Journal of Geophysics – Chinese Edition 58 (11), 4052–4067.

4. Copley A., 2008. Kinematics and dynamics of the southeastern margin of the tibetan plateau. Geophysical Journal International 174 (3), 1081–1100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03853.x.

5. Flesch L.M., Holt W.E., Silver P.G., Stephenson M., Wang Ch.-Yo., Chan W., 2005. Constraining the extent of crust-mantle coupling in Central Asia using GPS, geologic, and shear wave splitting data. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 238 (1–2), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.023.

6. Gatinsky Y.G., 2005. Tectonics and geodynamic prerequisites of mineral resource distribution in the Indochina Region. Geology of Ore Deposits 47 (4), 309–325.

7. Gatinsky Y.G., Prokhorova T.V., 2014. Superficial and deep structure of Central Asia as example of continental lithosphere heterogeneity. Universal Journal of Geoscience 2 (2), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujg.2014.020202.

8. Gatinsky Y.G., Prokhorova T.V., Rundquist D.V., Vladova G.L., 2009. Zones of catastrophic earthquakes of Central Asia: geodynamics and seismic energy. Russian Journal of Earth Sciences 11 (1), ES1001. https://doi.org/10.2205/2009ES000326.

9. Gatinsky Y.G., Rundquist D.V., Cherkasov S.V., 2005. Geodivider of 102–103° in East Asia: geological and metallogenic signs. In: Tectonics of Earth crust and mantle. tectonic regularities of minerals placing. Proceedings of the 28th Tectonic Conference. GEOS, Moscow, p. 127–130 (in Russian).

10. Gatinsky Y.G., Rundquist D.V., Vladova G.L., Prokhorova T.V., 2008. Geodynamics of the Sichuan earthquake region in May 12, 2008. Doklady Earth Sciences 423A (9), 1507–1509. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X08090419.

11. Gatinsky Y.G., Rundquist D.V., Vladova G.L., Prokhorova T.V., 2011. Up-to-date geodynamics and seismicity of Central Asia. International Journal of Geosciences 2, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2011.21001.

12. Gatinsky Y.G., Vladova G.L., 2008. Subduction zones of SE Asia: main types, seismicity and mineralization. In: Proceedings of the VAG International Symposium (November 7–9, 2008, Hanoi, Vietnam). Special issue of Journal of Geology: International Year of Planet Earth, p. 9–16. Available from: http://idm.gov.vn/nguon_luc/Xuat_ban/2008/b31-32/b9.htm.

13. Heidbach O., Rajabi M., Reiter K., Ziegler M., WSM Team, 2016. World Stress Map Database. Release 2016. GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/10.5880/WSM.2016.001.

14. Hu J., Yang H., Xu X., Wen L., Li G., 2012. Lithospheric structure and crust – mantle decoupling in the southeast edge of the Tibetan Plateau. Gondwana Research 22 (3–4), 1060–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2012.01.003.

15. Huang J., Zhao D., 2009. Seismic imaging of the crust and upper mantle under Beijing and surrounding regions. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 173 (3–4), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2009.01.015.

16. Kanamori H., Anderson D.L., 1975. Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 65 (5), 1073–1095.

17. Komarov Yu.V., Belichenko V.G., Misharina L.A., Petrov P.A., 1978. Verkhoyansk-Burma zone of Central and East Asia structures joining (VEBIRS Zone). In: Transasian continental VEBIRS zone (Operational Information). East Siberian Branch of Siberian Department, the USSR Academy of Sciences, Irkutsk, p. 5–24 (in Russian).

18. Kozhevnikov V.M., Yanovskaya T.B., 2005. S-wave velocities distribution in the lithosphere of the Asian continent after data of surface Rayleigh waves. In: K.G. Levi, S.I. Sherman (Eds.), Actual problems of modern geodynamics of Central Asia. Publishing House of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, p. 46–64 (in Russian).

19. Li S., Unsworth M.J., Booker J.R., Wei W., Tan H., Jones S., 2003. Partial melt or aqueous fluid in the mid-crust of Southern Tibet? Constraints from INDEPTH magnetotelluric data. Geophysical Journal International 153 (2), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01850.x.

20. Li J., Wang X., Niu F., 2011. Seismic anisotropy and implication for mantle deformation beneath the NE margin of the Tibet plateau and Ordos plateau. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 189 (3–4), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2011.08.009.

21. Liu-Zeng J., Zhang Z., Wen L., Tapponnier P., Sun J., Xing X., Hu G., Xu Q., Zeng L., Ding L., 2009. Co-seismic ruptures of the 12 May 2008, Ms 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan: east–west crustal shortening on oblique, parallel thrusts along the eastern edge of Tibet. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 286 (3–4), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.07.017.

22. Lukhnev A.V., San'kov V.A., Miroshnichenko A.I., Ashurkov S.V., Calais E., 2010. GPS rotation and strain rates in the Baikal–Mongolia region. Russian Geology and Geophysics 51 (7), 785–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2010.06.006.

23. Miroshnichenko A.I., San’kov V.A., Parfeevets A.V., Lukhnev A.V., 2007. State of stress and strain of the Earth crust of the basins of North Mongolia from the model results. In: Proceedings of the conference commemorating the 50th anniversary of the 1957 Gobi-Altay earthquake. Ulaanbaatar–Irkutsk, p. 138–143.

24. Molnar P., Tapponier P., 1975. Cenozoic tectonics of Asia: effects of a continental collision. Science 189 (4201), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.189.4201.419.

25. Parfeevets A.V., San’kov V.A., 2012. Late Cenozoic tectonic stress fields of the Mongolian microplate. Comptes Rendus Geoscience 344 (3–4), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2011.09.009.

26. Rundquist D.V., Gatinsky Yu.G., Cherkasov S.V., 2004. The natural trans-Eurasian divider: structural and metallogenic evidences. In: Abstracts volume of the 32nd International Geological Congress. Part 2. Florence, Italy, p. 620.

27. San’kov V.A., Lukhnev A.V., Miroshnichenko A.I., Dobrynina A.A., Ashurkov S.V., Byzov L.M., Dembelov M.G., Calais E., Déverchère J., 2014. Contemporary horizontal movements and seismicity of the South Baikal Basin (Baikal rift system). Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 50 (6), 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106935131406007X

28. San’kov V.A., Parfeevets A.V., Lukhnev A.V., Miroshnichenko A.I., Ashurkov S.V., 2011. Late Cenozoic geodynamics and mechanical coupling of crustal and mantle deformation in Mongolia-Siberia mobile area. Geotectonics 45 (5), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852111050049.

29. San’kov V.A., Parfeevets A.V., Miroshnichenko A.I., Sankov A.V., Bayasgalan A., Battogtokh D., 2015. Active faults paragenesis and the state of crustal stresses in the Late Cenozoic in Central Mongolia. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 6 (4), 491–518 (in Russian).

30. Seminskii K.Zh., 2008. Hierarchy in the zone block lithospheric structure of Central and Eastern Asia. Russian Geology and Geophysics 49 (10), 771–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2007.11.017.

31. Shen Z.K., Lü J., Wang M., Bürgmann R., 2005. Contemporary crustal deformation around the southeast borderland of the Tibetan plateau. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 110 (B11), B11409. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003421.

32. Sherman S.I., 2012. Destruction of the lithosphere: Fault block divisibility and its tectonophysical regularities. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 3 (4), 315–344 (in Russian).. https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2012-3-4-0077.

33. Sherman S.I., 2015. Localization of recent strong earthquakes in Central Asia: a rare combination of geodynamic and trigger factors. In: V.V. Adushkin, G.G. Kocharian (Eds.), Trigger effects in geosystems. GEOS, Moscow, p. 138–149 (in Russian).

34. Sherman S.I., 2016. Tectonophysical signs of the formation of strong earthquake foci in seismic zones of Central Asia. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 7 (4), 495–512 (in Russian). http://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2016-7-4-0219.

35. Sherman S.I., Seminsky K.Zh., Cheremnykh A.V., 1999. Destructive zones and fault-produced block structures of Central Asia. Tikhookeanskaya Geologiya 18 (2), 41–53 (in Russian).

36. Sol S., Meltze A., Bürgmann R., van der Hilst R.D., King R., Chen Z., Koons P.O., Lev E., Liu Y.P., Zeitler P.K., Zhang X., Zhang J., Zurek B., 2007. Geodynamics of the southeastern Tibetan plateau from seismic anisotropy and geodesy. Geology 35 (6), 563–566. https://doi.org/10.1130/G23408A.1.

37. Solon K.D., Jones A.G., Nelson K.D., Unsworth M.J., Kidd W.F., Wei W., Tan H., Jin S., Deng M., Booker J.R., Li S., Bedrosian P., 2005. Structure of the crust in the vicinity of the Banggong-Nujiang Suture in Central Tibet from INDEPTH magnetotelluric data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 110 (B10), B10102. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002405.

38. Tectonic Map of China and Adjacent Regions, 1999. Compiled by the Tectonic Division of the Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences. Chief compiler Ren Jishun. 1st ed. Geological Publishing House, Beijing.

39. Trifonov V.G., Soboleva O.V., Trifonov R.V., Vostrikov G.A., 2002. Recent Geodynamics of the Alpine-Himalayan Collision Belt. GEOS, Moscow, 225 p. (in Russian).[Трифонов В.Г., Соболева О.В., Трифонов Р.В., Востриков Г.А. Современная геодинамика Альпийско-Гималайского коллизионного пояса. М.: ГЕОС, 2002. 225 с.

40. Wang Ch.Yo., Yang W.C., Wu J.P., Ding Zh.F., 2015. Study on the lithospheric structure and earthquakes in North-South Tectonic Belt. Chinese Journal of Geophysics – Chinese Edition 58 (11), 3867–3901.

41. Wu F.T., Levshin A.L., Kozhevnikov V.M., 1997. Rayleigh wave group velocity tomography of Siberia, China and the vicinity. Pure and Applied Geophysics 149 (3), 447–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s000240050035.

42. Xu X., Deng Q., 1996. Nonlinear characteristics of paleoseismicity in China. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 101 (B3), 6209–6231. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB01238.

43. Yuan X., Egorov A.S., GEMOC, 2000. A Short Introduction to Global Geoscience Transect 21: Arctic Ocean – Eurasia– Pacific Ocean. Science Press, 32 p.

44. Zhang Zh., Bai Zh., Mooney W., Wang C., Chen X., Wang E., Teng J., Okaya J., 2009. Crustal structure across the Three Gorges area of the Yangtze platform, Central China, from seismic refraction/wide-angle reflection data. Tectonophysics 475 (3–4), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.05.022.

45. Zhang Zh., Wu J., Deng Ya., Teng J., Zhang X., Chen Yu., Panza G., 2012. Lateral variation of the strength of lithosphere across the eastern North China Craton: New constraints on lithospheric disruption. Gondwana Research 22 (3–4), 1047–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2012.03.006.

46. Zonenshain L. P., Savostin L. A., 1981. Geodynamics of the Baikal rift zone and plate tectonics of Asia. Tectonophysics 76 (1–2), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(81)90251-1.


Review

For citations:


Gatinsky Yu.G., Prokhorova T.V., Rundquist D.V. The 102–103° E geodivider in the modern lithosphere structure of Сentral Asia. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2018;9(3):989–1006. https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2018-9-3-0380

Views: 1477


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-502X (Online)