Regularities of crustal faulting and tectonophysical indicators of fault metastability
https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2018-9-3-0365
Abstract
The problem of forecasting seismic hazards is discussed. The stress state data characterizing various aspects of brittle failure are reviewed in detail. It is shown that the most convenient tool for analyzing such data is the Mohr stress diagram and the Coulomb criterion. Noted is the role of a fluid in not only reducing the normal stresses responsible for brittle failure, but also predetermining the major processes in fault zones. In each fault body, a node can be distinguished as a fault part wherein the main structural and material transformations take place. The node contains narrow elongated zones of modification of mylonites, from protomylonites to ultramylonites and blastomylonites, that are related to the localization of continuous and discontinuous shear deformation. Due to the metamorphic processes, fault zones are less strong than the surrounding consolidated blocks of the crust. A theoretical analysis of the mechanism of displacements along the discontinuities of different scale ranks shows differences in their manifestation. Tectonic and seismic displacements along the rupture occupy the entire area at once, while displacements along the fault zone occur in stages along its extent and follow the ‘rolling-carpet’ principle that is also typical of intra-crystal dislocations. The stress state in the vicinity of ruptures and faults has different characteristic features. Based on the seismological and tectonophysical data on earthquake focal parameters and discontinuities, it is possible to identify two or three ranks of stresses, which differ in the laws predetermining their mutual relationships. Actually, this conclusion contradicts the hypothesis of self-similarity of discontinuities in their continuous range, from a dislocation to a fault zone, which length amounts to tens of kilometers. Besides, it imposes a restriction on the use of statistical analysis of seismic data. The seismic data show that in the source of a large earthquake, displacement develops as a running band (‘rolling-carpet’ principle). In the source of a weak earthquake, it occupies the entire earthquake focal area at once. The differences in the types of shearing in the sources of weak and strong earthquakes are related to the relationships between three dynamic parameters of the medium: velocity of seismic wave propagation, rate of rupture propagation, and displacement rate of the sides of the fracture. Using tectonophysical methods, the stress state was reconstructed for the seismically active regions of the planet and the sources of the mega-earthquakes of the 21st century. Based on the reconstructions, the mean strength and stress values were calculated, and the specific features of the stress fields were revealed. It is established that the strongest regional earthquakes ‘avoided’ the areas with increased effective isotropic pressure. The sizes of the sources of the strongest earthquakes were controlled by the size of the region with decreased effective pressure. The sites, wherefrom the earthquake were initiated, were often located in the zones of the highest stress gradients. These regularities support the term “metastability of the state of fault zone” (introduced to seismology from the physics of the states of matter) and justify it by a specific distribution pattern of stress values prior to the mega-earthquake. Based on the tectonophysical definition of the metastable state of faults, the important role is outlined for a stress gradient zone that represents a location wherein a trigger earthquake occurs. The ‘maturity’ of the zone with increased stress gradient values is, in essence, a characteristic of the time interval of metastability of the fault zone.
About the Author
Yu. L. RebetskyRussian Federation
Yuri L. Rebetsky, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Head of Laboratory
10 Bol’shaya Gruzinskaya street, Moscow D-242 123242, GSP-5
References
1. Benioff H., 1951. Earthquakes and rock creep:(Part I: Creep characteristics of rocks and the origin of aftershocks). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 41 (1), 31–62.
2. Beroza G.C., Mikumo T., 1996. Short slip duration in dynamic rupture in the presence of heterogeneous fault properties. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 101 (B10), 22449–22460. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JB02291.
3. Bullen K.E., 1953. On strain energy and strength in the Earth's upper mantle. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 34 (1), 107–109. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR034i001p00107.
4. Chemenda A.I., Mas D., 2016. Dependence of rock properties on the Lode angle: Experimental data, constitutive model, and bifurcation analysis. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 96, 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2016.08.004.
5. Chester F.M., Rowe C., Ujiie K., Kirkpatrick J., Regalla C., Remitti F., Moore J.C., Toy V., Wolfson-Schwehr M., Bose S., Kame-da J., Mori J.J., Brodsky E.E., Eguchi N., Toczko S., Expedition 343 and 343T Scientists, 2013. Structure and composition of the plate-boundary slip zone for the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Science 342 (6163), 1208–1211. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1243719.
6. Chikov B.M., 1990. On the fundamentals of the theoretical concept of stress metamorphism (applied to the lineament zones of the crust). In: V.A. Soloviev, B.M. Chikov (Eds.), Structure of lineament zones of stress metamorphism. SB, Nauka, Novosibirsk, p. 6–32 (in Russian).
7. Chikov B.M., 1992. Shear stress – structure formation in the lithosphere: varieties of mechanisms, and conditions (review of the problem). Geologiya i Geofizika (Russian Geology and Geophysics) 33 (9), 3–37 (in Russian).
8. Chikov B.M., 2011. Introduction to Physical Fundamentals of Static and Dynamic Geotectonics. Geo, Novosibirsk, 299 p. (in Russian.
9. Chikov B.M., Kargapolov S.A., Ushakov G.D., 1989. Experimental stress-transformation of pyroxenite. Geologiya i Geofizika (Soviet Geology and Geophysics) 30 (6), 75–79 (in Russian).
10. Das S., Aki K., 1977. Fault plane with barriers: a versatile earthquake model. Journal of Geophysical Research 82 (36), 5658–5670. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB082i036p05658.
11. Das S., Kostrov B.V., 1988. An investigation of the complexity of the earthquake source time function using dynamic faulting models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 93 (B7), 8035–8050. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB093iB07p08035.
12. Day S.M., Gonzalez S.H., Anooshehpoor R., Brune J.N., 2008. Scale-model and numerical simulations of near-fault seismic directivity. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98 (3), 1186–1206. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070190.
13. Enikolopyan N.S., Mkhitryan A.A., Karagezyan A.S., Khzardzhyan A.A., 1987. Critical phenomena in the explosion of solids at high pressure. Doklady AN SSSR 292 (4), 887–890 (in Russian).
14. Fedotov S.A., Solomatin A.V., Chernyshev S.D., 2004. Long-term seismic forecast for the Kuril-Kamchatka arc in 2004–2008, and a retrospective forecast of the Hokkaido earthquake of 25 September 2003, M=8.1. Vulkanologiya i Seismologiya (5), 3–22 (in Russian).
15. Goldin S.V., 2004. Dilatancy, repacking, and earthquakes. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 40 (10), 817–832.
16. Goldin S.V., 2005. Macro- and mesostructures of the focal area of the earthquake. Fizicheskaya Mezomekhanika 8 (1), 5–14 (in Russian).
17. Gusev A.A., 1988. Model of earthquake source with much unevenness. Vulkanologiya i Seismologiya (1), 41–55 (in Russian).
18. Gusev A.A., 1989. Multiasperity fault model and the nature of short-period subsources. Pure and Applied Geophysics 130 (4), 635–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881602.
19. Gusev A.A., 2013. Stochastic modeling of a lengthy earthquake source to characterize seismic hazard. 1. Justification and the general structure of the algorithm. Voprosy Inzhenernoi Seismologii (Problems of Engineering Seismology) 40 (1), 5–18 (in Russian).[. 1. Обоснование и общая структура алгоритма // Вопросы инженерной сейсмологии. 2013. Т. 40. № 1. C. 5–18.
20. Gusev A.A., Guseva E.M., 2014. Scaling properties of corner frequencies of Kamchatka earthquakes. Doklady Earth Sciences 458 (1), 1112–1115. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X14090062.
21. Gusev A.A., Guseva E.M., 2016. Shear wave attenuation estimated from the spectral decay rate in the vicinity of the Petropavlovsk station, Kamchatka. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 52 (4), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351316030034.
22. Gzovsky M.V., 1954. Tectonic stress fields. Izvestiya AN SSSR, Geophysical Series (5), 390–410 (in Russian).
23. Gzovsky M.V., 1957a. Tectonophysical justification of geological seismicity criteria. I. Izvestiya AN SSSR, Geophysical Series (2), 141–160 (in Russian).
24. Gzovsky M.V., 1957b. Tectonophysical justification of geological seismicity criteria. II. Izvestiya AN SSSR, Geophysical Series (3), 273–283 (in Russian).
25. Gzovsky М.V., 1975. Fundamentals of Tectonophysics. Nauka, Moscow, 536 p. (in Russian).
26. Haskell N.A., 1964. Total energy and energy spectral density of elastic wave radiation from propagating faults. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 54 (6A), 1811–1841.
27. Haskell N.A., 1966. Total energy and energy spectral density of elastic wave radiation from propagating faults. Part II. A statistical source model. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 56 (1), 125–140.
28. Heaton T.H., 1990. Evidence for and implications of self-healing pulses of slip in earthquake rupture. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 64 (1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(90)90002-F.
29. Ide S., Takeo M., 1997. Determination of constitutive relations of fault slip based on seismic wave analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 102 (B12), 27379–27391. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JB02675.
30. Irikura K., Kamae K., 1994. Estimation of strong ground motion in broad-frequency band based on a seismic source scaling model and an empirical Green's function technique. Annali di Geofisica 37 (6), 1721–1743. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-4137.
31. Kanamori H., 1978. Use of seismic radiation to infer source parameters. In: Proceedings of conference III: Fault mechanics and its relation to earthquake prediction. USGS Open File Report 78-380, p. 283–318.
32. Kanamori H., Brodsky E.E., 2004. The physics of earthquakes. Reports on Progress in Physics 67 (8), 1429–1496. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/67/8/R03.
33. Kocharyan G.G., 2014. Scale effect in seismotectonics. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 5 (2), 353–385 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2014-5-2-0133.
34. Kocharyan G.G., 2017. Geomechanics of Faults. GEOS, Moscow, 424 p. (in Russian).
35. Kocharyan G.G., Kishkina S.B., Novikov V.А., Ostapchuk А.А., 2014. Slow slip events: parameters, conditions of occurrence, and future research prospects. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 5 (4), 863–891 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2014-5-4-0160.
36. Latynina L.A., 2009. On the unstable state of the geological medium in the zone of the strongest earthquakes. Geodesy, Cartography, and Aerial Photography 71, 238–241 (in Russian).
37. Lin A., Maruyama T., Kobayashi K., 2007. Tectonic implications of damage zone-related fault-fracture networks revealed in drill core through the Nojima fault, Japan. Tectonophysics 443 (3–4), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2007.01.011.
38. Lockner D.A., Tanaka H., Ito H., Ikeda R., Omura K., Naka H., 2009. Geometry of the Nojima Fault at Nojima-Hirabayashi, Japan – I. A simple damage structure inferred from borehole core permeability. Pure and Applied Geophysics 166 (10–11), 1649–1667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-009-0515-0.
39. Mjachkin V.I., Brace W.F., Sobolev G.A., Dieterich J.H., 1975. Two models for earthquake forerunners. Pure and Applied Geophysics 113 (1), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01592908.
40. Nettles M., Ekström G., 2004. Long-period source characteristics of the 1975 Kalapana, Hawaii, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94 (2), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120030090.
41. Nikolaevsky V.N., Sharov V.I., 1985. Faults and rheological stratification of the crust. Izvestiya AN SSSR, Seriya Fizika Zemli (1), 16–28 (in Russian).
42. Papageorgiou A.S., Aki K., 1983. A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. I. Description of the model. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 73 (3), 693–722.
43. Patalakha E.I., Lukienko A.I., Derbenev V.A., 1987. Tectonofacies of Mezozone. Nauka, Alma-Ata, 181 p. (in Russian).
44. Peng Z., Gomberg J., 2010. An integrated perspective of the continuum between earthquakes and slow-slip phenomena. Nature Geoscience 3 (9), 599–607. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo940.
45. Pospelov G.S. 1972. Dispergites and autodispergation as an important problem in the physics of litho-petro-tectogenesis. Geologiya i Geofizika (Soviet Geology and Geophysics) 13 (12), 53–73 (in Russian).
46. Rebetskii Y.L., 1997. Reconstruction of tectonic stresses and seismotectonic strain: Methodical fundamentals, current stress field of Southeastern Asia and Oceania. Transactions (Doklady) of the Russian Academy of Sciences / Earth Science Sections 354 (4), 560–563.
47. Rebetskii Y.L., 2005. Tectonic stress, metamorphism, and earthquake source model. Doklady Earth Sciences 400 (1), 127–131.
48. Rebetsky Y.L., 1996. I. Stress-monitoring: Issues of reconstruction methods of tectonic stresses and seismotectonic deformations. Journal of Earthquake Prediction Research 5 (4), 557–573.
49. Rebetsky Y.L., 2003a. Fluids, dilatancy and rock strength. In: Physicochemical and petrophysical studies in the Earth sciences. Abstracts of the Fourth International Conference. UIPE RAS, Moscow, p. 46 (in Russian).
50. Rebetsky Y.L., 2003b. Stress-strain State and Mechanical Properties of Natural Massifs According to the Data on the Earthquake Focal Mechanisms and Structural-Kinematic Characteristics of Fractures. PhD Thesis (Doctor of Physics and Mathematics). UIPE RAS, Moscow, 455 p. (in Russian).
51. Rebetsky Y.L., 2004. From the analysis of tectonic stresses to the earthquake source model. In: Seismic studies of the Earth's crust. Collection of Reports of the International Scientific Conference (23–25 November 2004, Novosibirsk). Novosibirsk, p. 460–465 (in Russian).
52. Rebetsky Y.L., 2005a. Inhomogeneity of the stress state of fault zones – the main factor of earthquake occurrence. In: Active geophysical monitoring of Earth's lithosphere. Proceedings of the International Conference (12–16 September 2005, Novosibirsk). Publishing House of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, p. 340–343 (in Russian).
53. Rebetsky Y.L., 2005b. The role of fluid and dispergation of rocks in the formation of the earthquake preparation area. In: Modern geodynamics and hazardous natural processes in Central Asia. Proceedings of the All-Russia conference (20–23 September 2005, Irkutsk). IEC SB RAS, Irkutsk, p. 145–148 (in Russian).
54. Rebetsky Y.L., 2006a. Dilatancy, pore fluid pressure, and new data on the strength of rock massifs in natural occurrence. In: Y.G. Leonov, I.G. Kissin, V.L. Rusinov (Eds.), Fluid and geodynamics. Nauka, Moscow, p. 120–146 (in Russian).
55. Rebetsky Y.L., 2006b. The relationship between brittle failure and quasiplastic deformation of rocks, and a new model of earthquake preparation. In: Areas of active tectogenesis in modern and ancient history of the Earth. Materials of the XXXVX Tectonic Meeting. Vol. II. GEOS, Moscow, p. 129–133 (in Russian).
56. Rebetsky Y.L., 2007a. New data on natural stresses in the preparation area of a strong earthquake. The model of earthquake source. Geophysical Journal 29 (6), 92–110 (in Russian).
57. Rebetsky Y.L., 2007b. Tectonic stresses and areas of the trigger mechanism of earthquake occurrence. Fizicheskaya Mezomekhanika 10 (1), 25–37 (in Russian).
58. Rebetsky Y.L., 2007c. The state and problems of the theory of earthquake prediction. Analysis of the foundations from the position of the deterministic approach. Geophysical Journal 29 (4), 92–110 (in Russian).
59. Rebetsky Y.L., 2009. Stress state of the Earth’s crust of the Kuril Islands and Kamchatka before the Simushir earthquake. Russian Journal of Pacific Geology 3 (5), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819714009050108.
60. Rebetsky Y.L., 2011. Assessment of seismic hazard based on the tectonophysical analysis of seismological data. In: Problems of seismotectonics. The XVII All-Russia Conference with International Participation (20–24 September 2011). Voronezh–Moscow, p. 443–451 (in Russian).
61. Rebetsky Y.L., 2015. On the specific state of crustal stresses in intracontinental orogens. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 6 (4), 437–466 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2015-6-4-0189.
62. Rebetsky Y.L., Kuchai O.A., Marinin A.V., 2013. Stress state and deformation of the Earth's crust in the Altai-Sayan mountain region. Russian Geology and Geophysics 54 (2), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2013.01.011.
63. Rebetsky Y.L., Kuchai O.A., Sycheva N.A., Tatevossian R.E., 2012. Development of inversion methods on fault slip data: Stress state in orogenes of the Central Asia. Tectonophysics 581, 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.09.027.
64. Rebetsky Y.L., Kuzikov S.I., 2016. Active faults of the northern Tien Shan: tectonophysical zoning of seismic risk. Russian Geology and Geophysics 57 (6), 967–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2016.05.004.
65. Rebetsky Y.L., Lermontova A.S., 2015. On the scalability of shear fractures in the geological medium. In: Trigger effects in geosystems. Proceedings of the Third All-Russia Workshop-Meeting (16–19 June 2015, Moscow). GEOS, Moscow, p. 174–181 (in Russian).
66. Rebetsky Y.L., Marinin A.V., 2006. Preseismic stress field before the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 26.12. 2004: a model of metastable state of rocks. Geologiya i Geofizika (Russian Geology and Geophysics) 47 (11), 1173–1185.
67. Rebetsky Y.L., Polets A.Y., 2014. The state of stresses of the lithosphere in Japan before the catastrophic Tohoku earthquake of 11 march 2011. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 5 (2), 469–506 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2014-5-2-0137.
68. Rebetsky Y.L., Polets A.Y., Zlobin T.K., 2016. The state of stress in the Earth's crust along the northwestern flank of the Pacific seismic focal zone before the Tohoku earthquake of 11 March 2011. Tectonophysics 685, 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2016.07.016.
69. Rebetsky Y.L., Tatevossian R.E., 2013. Rupture propagation in strong earthquake sources and tectonic stress field. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 184 (4–5), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.184.4-5.335.
70. Rebinder P.A., 1978. Surface Phenomena in Disperse Systems. Nauka, Moscow, 250 p. (in Russian).
71. Reid H.F., 1910. The Mechanism of the Earthquake. The California Earthquake of April 18, 1906. Report of the State Earthquake Investigation Commission, vol. 2. part 1. Washington, 56 p.
72. Rice J., 1982. The mechanics of earthquake rupture. In: A. Dziewonski, E. Boschi (Eds.), Physics of the Earth's Interior. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 555–649.
73. Richter C.F., 1958. Elementary Seismology. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 768 p.
74. Ruzhich V.V., Kocharyan G.G., 2017. On the structure and formation of earthquake sources in the faults located in the subsurface and deep levels of the crust. Part I. Subsurface level. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 8 (4), 1021–1034 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2017-8-4-0330.
75. Savage J.C., Svarc J.L., Yu S.B., 2007. Postseismic relaxation and aftershocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 112 (B6), B06406. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004584.
76. Savage J.C., Yu S.B., 2007. Postearthquake relaxation and aftershock accumulation linearly related after the 2003 M 6.5 Chengkung, Taiwan, and the 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 97 (5), 1632–1645. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070069.
77. Scholz C.H., Engelder J.T., 1976. The role of asperity indentation and ploughing in rock friction – I: Asperity creep and stick-slip. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 13 (5), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(76)90819-6.
78. Scholz C.H., Sykes L.R., Aggarwal Y.P., 1973. Earthquake prediction: A physical basis. Science 181 (4102), 803–810. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.181.4102.803.
79. Sekine S., Hirose H., Obara K., 2010. Along‐strike variations in short‐term slow slip events in the southwest Japan subduction zone. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 115 (B9), B00A27. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB006059.
80. Sherman S.I., 1977. Physical Regularities of Faulting in the Earth's Crust. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 102 p. (in Russian).
81. Sherman S.I., 2013. Deformation waves as a trigger mechanism of seismic activity in seismic zones of the continental lithosphere. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 4 (2), 83–117 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2013-4-2-0093.
82. Sherman S.I., 2016. Tectonophysical signs of the formation of strong earthquake foci in seismic zones of Central Asia. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 7 (4), 495–512 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2016-7-4-0219.
83. Sherman S.I., Bornyakov S.A., Buddo V.Yu., 1983. Areas of Dynamic Influence of Faults (Modelling Results). Nauka, Novosibirsk, 110 p. (in Russian).
84. Sobolev G.A., Lyubushin A.A., 2007. Microseismic anomalies before the Sumatra earthquake of December 26, 2004. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 43 (5), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351307050011.
85. Tikhonov I.N., Shevchenko G.V. (Eds.), 2014. Shikotan Earthquake and Tsunami of 4(5) October 1994. Institute of Marine Geology and Geophysics FEB RAS, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 128 p. (in Russian).
86. Ulomov V.I., 1997. On the methodology for assessment of seismic hazard and creating maps of general seismic zoning of the territory of the CIS countries. In: Forecast of earthquakes and deep geodynamics. Reports of the International Symposium (17–21 November 1997, Almaty). Institute of Seismology of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty, p. 348–359 (in Russian).
87. van der Pluijm B.A., 1991. Marble mylonites in the Bancroft shear zone, Ontario, Canada: microstructures and deformation mechanisms. Journal of Structural Geology 13 (10), 1125–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(91)90073-R.
88. Wei M., Kaneko Y., Liu Y., McGuire J.J., 2013. Episodic fault creep events in California controlled by shallow frictional heterogeneity. Nature Geoscience 6 (7), 566–570. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1835.
89. Zeng Y., Anderson J.G., Yu G., 1994. A composite source model for computing realistic synthetic strong ground motions. Geophysical Research Letters 21 (8), 725–728. https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL00367
Review
For citations:
Rebetsky Yu.L. Regularities of crustal faulting and tectonophysical indicators of fault metastability. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2018;9(3):629-652. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2018-9-3-0365