Preview

Geodynamics & Tectonophysics

Advanced search

The rheology of the geological medium of interblock seismically active faults in the continental lithosphere: a key to understanding the generation of the strongest earthquakes in Central Asia

https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2018-9-3-0363

Abstract

The problem of earthquake forecasting remains challenging, especially considering strong seismic events (M≥8). Strong earthquakes occur most often along the fault planes due to large-amplitude displacements of the contacting blocks. In such cases, the physical parameters of the earthquake foci generation process are estimated on the basis of the concepts describing the destruction of solids. In this paper, we present a new tectonophysical model of strong earthquake foci in the continental lithosphere. In this model, an earthquake focus is viewed as a body whose rheological properties are changing over time throughout the entire seismic period, including the moment of the seismic event initiation, its occurrence and the subsequent stress release in of the geological medium. In the period when a future earthquake source develops and grows, the physical properties of the host rocks are assumed to change substantially, and both the viscosity and the relative shear strength decreases. At the moment of time when a strong earthquake takes place, the viscosity of the rocks in its focus is at its minimum value and thus favorable for high-amplitude interblock shearing under the current regional stress and unchanged geodynamic factors. A decrease in the viscosity is facilitated by an increase in the fault length and leads to weakening of the geological medium and decreases its strength properties. When the earthquake occurs, the viscosity of the rocks in its source is assumed significantly lower than the dynamic viscosity of the lithosphere and not less than one or two orders below the viscosity of the interblock seismically active medium containing the source. It is most likely that at the moment of time when an earthquake takes place, the viscosity in its source is 1017–1019 Pa·s. In our approach, the parameter of viscosity is introduced into the physics of earthquake foci, and the time factor is taken into account when studying the process of earthquake preparation and occurrence, which can be an important step to gaining more knowledge for forecasting of the strongest seismic events (M≥8).

 

About the Authors

S. I. Sherman
Institute of the Earth’s Crust, Siberian Branch of RAS
Russian Federation

Semen I. Sherman, Academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Doctor of Geology and Mineralogy, Professor, Chief Researcher, Institute of the Earth’s Crust

128 Lermontov street, Irkutsk 664033



E. A. Gorbunova
Institute of the Earth’s Crust, Siberian Branch of RAS
Russian Federation

Ekaterina A. Gorbunova, Candidate of Geology and Mineralogy, Junior Researcher

128 Lermontov street, Irkutsk 664033



References

1. Aki K., 1966. Estimation of earthquake moment released energy and stress-strain drop from G-wave spectrum. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo 44 (1), 23–72.

2. Benioff H., 1964. Earthquake source mechanisms. Science 143 (3613), 1399–1406. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.143.3613.1399.

3. Chang W.L., Smith R.B., Puskas C.M., 2013. Effects of lithospheric viscoelastic relaxation on the contemporary deformation following the 1959 Mw 7.3 Hebgen Lake, Montana, earthquake and other areas of the intermountain seismic belt. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 14 (1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004424.

4. Davtyan A.M., Grigoryan T.A., 2010. On a method for calculating the effective viscosity of rocks in the focal area of earthquakes. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, Earth Sciences 63 (2), 70–75 (in Russian).

5. Dobrovolsky I.P., 1991. The Theory of Tectonic Earthquake Preparation. Nauka, Moscow, 218 p. (in Russian).

6. Dobrovolsky I.P., 2009. Mathematical Theory on Preparation and Forecasting of a Tectonic Earthquake. Fizmatlit, Moscow, 240 p. (in Russian).

7. Florensov N.A., Solonenko V.P. (Eds.), 1963. The Gobi-Altai Earthquake. Publishing House of Academy of Sciences of USSR, Moscow, 424 p. (in Russian).

8. Jiang M., Zhou S., Chen Y.J., Ai Y., 2011. A new multidimensional stress release statistical model based on coseismic stress transfer. Geophysical Journal International 187 (3), 1479–1494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05208.x.

9. Kocharyan G.G., 2016. Geomechanics of Faults. GEOS, Moscow, 424 p. (in Russian).

10. Kocharyan G.G., Kishkina S.B., Novikov V.A., Ostapchuk A.A., 2014. Slow slip events: parameters, conditions of occurrence, and future research prospects. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 5 (4), 863–891 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2014-5-4-0160.

11. Kocharyan G.G., Kishkina S.B., Ostapchuk A.A., 2010. Seismic picture of a fault zone. What can be gained from the analysis of fine patterns of spatial distribution of weak earthquake centers? Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 1 (4), 419–440 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2010-1-4-0027.

12. Kostrov B.V., 1975. Mechanics of Tectonic Earthquake Source. Nauka, Moscow, 176 p. (in Russian).

13. Kozachok A.A., 2006. Mathematical misunderstandings in the construction of closed classical equations of the dynamics of a viscous incompressible fluid (Navier–Stokes equations). Ukraine, Kiev (in Russian). Available from: http://a-kozachok1.narod.ru/stokes1S.pdf.

14. Kuchai V.K., Pevnev A.K., Guseva Т.V., 1978. On the modern tectonic movements in the Vakhsh thrust zone. Doklady AN SSSR 240 (3), 56–72 (in Russian).

15. Kuzmin Y.O., 2013. Recent geodynamics of the faults and paradoxes of the rates of deformation. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 49 (5), 626–642. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351313050029.

16. Kuzmin Y.O., 2014. Recent geodynamics of fault zones: faulting in real time scale. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 5 (2), 401–443 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2014-5-2-0135.

17. Kuzmin Y.O., 2017. Paradoxes of the comparative analysis of ground-based and satellite geodetic measurements in recent geodynamics. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 53 (6), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351317060027.

18. Lorenzo-Martín F., Roth F., Wang R., 2006. Inversion for rheological parameters from post-seismic surface deformation associated with the 1960 Valdivia earthquake, Chile. Geophysical Journal International 164 (1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02803.x.

19. Lukyanov A.V., 1991. Plastic Deformation and Tectonic Flow in the Lithosphere. Nauka, Moscow, 144 p. (in Russian).

20. Lu-Ping Z., Rodriguez-Llanes J.M., Qi W., van den Oever B., Westman L., Albela M., Liang P., Gao C., De-Sheng Z., Hughes M., von Schreeb J., Guha-Sapir D., 2012. Multiple injuries after earthquakes: a retrospective analysis on 1,871 injured patients from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Critical Care 16 (3), R87. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11349.

21. Ma J., Guo Y., Sherman S.I., 2014. Accelerated synergism along a fault: a possible indicator for an impending major earthquake. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 5 (2), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2014-5-2-0134.

22. Ma J., Sherman S.I., Guo Y., 2012. Edification of meta-instable stress state based on experimental study of evolution of the temperature field during stick-slip instability on 5° bending fault. Science China Earth Sciences 55 (6), 869–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-012-4423-2.

23. Mogi K., 1965. Deformation and fracture of rocks under confining pressure (2). Elasticity and plasticity of some rocks. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo 43, 349–379.

24. Mogi K., 1966. Pressure dependence of rock strength and transition from brittle fracture to ductile flow. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo 44, 215–232.

25. Montési L.G., 2004. Controls of shear zone rheology and tectonic loading on postseismic creep. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 109 (B10), B10404. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002925.

26. Nikolaevskiy V.N., Sobisevich L.E., 2015. The nature of bifocal source of the earthquake and precursors of the blow. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal 37 (4), 51–74 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v37i4.2015.111125.

27. Ozawa S., Nishimura T., Munekane H., Suito H., Kobayashi T., Tobita M., Imakiire T., 2012. Preceding, coseismic, and postseismic slips of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, Japan. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 117 (B7), B07404. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB009120.

28. Panin V.E., 1990. Modern problems of the physics of plasticity and strength of solids. In: V.E Panin (Ed.), Structural levels of plastic deformation and strain. Nauka, Novosibirsk, p. 5–20 (in Russian).

29. Panin V.E., 1998. Fundamentals of physical mesomechanics. Fizicheskaya Mezomekhanika (Physical Mesomechanics) 1 (1), 5–22 (in Russian).[Панин В.Е. Основы физической мезомеханики // Физическая мезомеханика. 1998. Т. 1. № 1. С. 5–22.

30. Panin V.E., 2000. Synergetic principles of physical mesomechanics. Fizicheskaya Mezomekhanika (Physical Mesomechanics) 3 (6), 5–36 (in Russian).

31. Panin V.E., Likhachev V.A., Grinyaev Yu.V., 1985. Structural Levels of Deformation of Solids. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 229 p. (in Russian).

32. Peive A.V., 1990. Selected Works. Deep Faults and Their Role in the Structure and Development of the Earth's Crust. Nauka, Moscow, 352 p. (in Russian).

33. Qi C., Haoxiang C., Bai J., Qi J., Li K., 2017. Viscosity of rock mass at different structural levels. Acta Geotechnica 12 (2), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0449-5.

34. Reid H.F., 1910. The Mechanics of the Earthquake. California Earthquake of April 18, 1906. Report of the State Earthquake Investigation Commission. Vol. 2, part 1. Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington, 56 p.

35. Riznichenko Yu.V., 1965. Relationship between rock flow and seismicity. Doklady AN SSSR 161 (1), 97–99 (in Russian).

36. Riznichenko Yu.V., 1985. Problems of Seismology. Selected Works. Nauka, Moscow, 408 p. (in Russian).

37. Rogozhin E.A., 2000. Tectonics of focal zones of strong earthquakes in Northern Eurasia at the end of the 20th century. Russian Journal of Earth Sciences 2 (1), 37–62 (in Russian).

38. Ruzhich V.V., 1997. Seismotectonic Destruction of the Earth's Crust in the Baikal Rift Zone. Publishing House of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 144 p. (in Russian).

39. Sadovsky M.A., Bolkhovitinov L.G., Pisarenko V.F., 1982. About the properties of discreteness of rocks. Fizika Zemli (12), 3–18 (in Russian).

40. Sadovsky M.A., Bolkhovitinov L.G., Pisarenko V.F., 1987. Deformation of Geophysical Medium and Seismic Process. Nauka, Moscow, 100 p. (in Russian).

41. Seminsky K.Zh., 2003. The Internal Structure of Continental Fault Zones. Tectonophysical Aspect. Publishing House of SB RAS, Geo Branch, Novosibirsk, 242 p. (in Russian).

42. Shao Z., Zhan W., Zhang L., Xu J., 2016. Analysis of the far-field co-seismic and post-seismic responses caused by the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Pure and Applied Geophysics 173 (2), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1131-9.

43. Sherman S.I., 2014. Seismic Process and the Forecast of Earthquakes: Tectonophysical Conception. Academic Publi-shing House “Geo”, Novosibirsk, 359 p. (in Russian).

44. Sherman S.I., Bornyakov S.A., Buddo V.Yu., 1983. Areas of Dynamic Influence of Faults (Modelling Results). Nauka, Novosibirsk, 110 p. (in Russian).

45. Sherman S.I., Ma J., Gorbunova Е.А., 2015. Recent strong earthquakes in Central Asia: regular tectonophysical features of locations in the structure and geodynamics of the lithosphere. Part 1. Main geodynamic factors predetermining locations of strong earthquakes in the structure of the lithosphere in Central Asia. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 6 (4), 409–436. https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2015-6-4-0188.

46. Sherman S.I., Zlogodukhova О.G., 2011. Seismic belts and zones of the Earth: formalization of notions, positions in the lithosphere, and structural control. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 2 (1), 1–34 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2011-2-1-0031.

47. Slavina L.B., Pivovarova N.B., 2009. Dynamics of the Field of Seismic Waves Velocities During the Periods of Seismic and Volcanic Activity in Kamchatka. IPE RAS, Moscow, 80 p. (in Russian).

48. Sobolev G.A., 2002. Dynamics of faulting and seismicity. In: V.N. Strakhov, Y.G. Leonov (Eds.), Tectonophysics today. IPE RAS, Moscow, p. 67–78 (in Russian).

49. Sobolev G.A., Ponomarev A.V., Maibuk Y.Y., 2016. Initiation of unstable slips–microearthquakes by elastic impulses. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 52 (5), 674–691. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106935131605013X.

50. Thatcher W., 1983. Nonlinear strain buildup and the earthquake cycle on the San Andreas fault. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 88 (B7), 5893–5902. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB088iB07p05893.

51. Ulomov V.I., 1993. Waves of seismogeodynamic activation and long-term forecasting of earthquakes. Fizika Zemli (4), 43–53 (in Russian).

52. Ulomov V.I., 1999. Seismogeodynamics and seismic zoning of Northern Eurasia. Bulletin of the Geology, Geophysics, Geochemistry and Mining Sciences Department of RAS (1), 2–26 (in Russian).

53. Žalohar J., 2016. The Omega-Theory. A New Physics of Earthquakes. Third Edition. T-TECTO, Kranj, Slovenia, 567 p.

54. Zavyalov A.D., 2006. Medium-Term Forecasting of Earthquakes: Fundamentals, Methods, Implementation. Nauka, Moscow, 254 p. (in Russian).

55. Zuev L.B., Danilov V.I., Barannikova S.A., 2008. Physics of Macrolocalization of Plastic Flow. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 327 p. (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Sherman S.I., Gorbunova E.A. The rheology of the geological medium of interblock seismically active faults in the continental lithosphere: a key to understanding the generation of the strongest earthquakes in Central Asia. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2018;9(3):571-586. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2018-9-3-0363

Views: 1019


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-502X (Online)