SEISMOTECTONIC DEFORMATION IN THE CONTACT AREA OF THE NAZCA AND SOUTH AMERICAN LITHOSPHERIC PLATES IN RELATION TO THE FEBRUARY 27, 2010 MW 8.8 MAULE EARTHQUAKE

Based on the data on earthquake focal mechanisms, we estimated seismotectonic deformation related to the 2010 Мw 8.8 Maule earthquake and analyzed the deformation at different depths. In the main seismic dislocation of the Maule earthquake and the northern area, the deformation field to a depth of 70 km is typical of subduction zones as evidenced by shortening in the direction of the oceanic plate subduction. Below a depth of 70 km, the deformation pattern changes sharply to horizontal stretching. After the main seismic event, as well as before it, nearlatitudinal shortening was dominant in the focal zone, while the region of the main seismic dislocations was surrounded by separate areas of near-latitudinal stretching, which is an opposite type of deformation. We conducted a detailed analysis of the seismotectonic deformations in the oceanic uplift area to the west of the deep-water trough and identified local zones of near-latitudinal stretching near the southern and northern boundaries of the future Maule earthquake zone. Detecting such zones can provide important data for early forecasting of regions wherein strong subduction-related earthquakes are being prepared.

2010 Maule earthquake, Nazca plate, Chile, seismotectonic deformation, earthquake focal mechanism, aftershock, earthquake preparation

1. Angermann D., Klotz J., Reigber C., 1999. Space-geodetic estimation of the Nazca–South America Euler vector. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 171 (3), 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00173-9.

2. Bianchi M., Heit B., Jakovlev A., Yuan X., Kay S.M., Sandvol E., Alonso R.N., Coira B., Brown L., Kind R., Comte D., 2013. Teleseismic tomography of the southern Puna plateau in Argentina and adjacent regions. Tectonophysics 586, 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.11.016.

3. Bilek S.L., 2010. Invited review paper: Seismicity along the South American subduction zone: Review of large earthquakes, tsunamis, and subduction zone complexity. Tectonophysics 495 (1–2), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.02.037.

4. Campos J., Hatzfeld D., Madariaga R., Lopez G., Kausel E., Zollo A., Iannacone G., Fromm R., Barriento, S., Lyon-Caen H., 2002. A seismological study of the 1835 seismic gap in south-central Chile. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 132 (1–3), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(02)00051-1.

5. Djadkov P.G., Mel'nikova V.I., Nazarov L.A., Nazarova L.A., San'kov V.A., 1999. Increase of seismotectonic activity in the Baikal region in 1989–95: results of experimental observations and numerical modeling of changes in the stressstrained state. Geologiya i Geofizika (Russian Geology and Geophysics) 40 (3), 373–386.

6. Dyadkov P., Mikheeva A., 2010. The expert earthquake database (EEDB) for seismic-geodynamic research. Bulletin of the Novosibirsk Computing Center. Series: Mathematical Modeling in Geophysics 13, 15–30.

7. Feng M., van der Lee S., Assumpc M., 2007. Upper mantle structure of South America from joint inversion of waveforms and fundamental mode group velocities of Rayleigh waves. Journal of Geophysical Research 112 (B4), B04312. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004449.

8. Global CMT Catalog Search, 2017. Available from: http://www.globalcmt.org/CMTsearch.html (last accessed August 14, 2017).

9. Hicks S.P., Rietbrock A., Haberland C.A., Ryder I.M.A., Simons M., Tassara A., 2012. The 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile earthquake: nucleation and rupture propagation controlled by a subducted topographic high. Geophysical Research Letters 39 (19), L19308. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053184.

10. Kostrov B.V., 1975. Mechanics of Tectonic Earthquake Source. Nauka, Moscow, 176 p. (in Russian) [Костров Б.В. Механика очага тектонического землетрясения. М.: Наука, 1975. 176 с.]

11. Lange D., Tilmann F., Barrientos S.E., Contreras-Reyes E., Methe P., Moreno М., Heit B., Agurto H., Bernard P., Vilotte J.-P., Beck S., 2012. Aftershock seismicity of the 27 February 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule earthquake rupture zone. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 317–318, 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.11.034.

12. Marotta G.S.A., França G.S., Monico J.F.G., Fuck R.A., de Araújo Filho J.O., 2013. Strain rate of South American lithospheric plate by SIRGAS-CON geodetic observations. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 47, 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2013.07.004.

13. Martin M.W., Kato T.T., Rodriguez C., Godoy E., Duhart P., McDonough M., Campos A., 1999. Evolution of the late Paleozoic accretionary complex and overlying forearc–magmatic arc, south central Chile (38°–41°S): constraints for the tectonic setting along the southwestern margin of Gondwana. Tectonics 18 (4), 582–605. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999TC900021.

14. Melnick D., Moreno M., Cisternas M., Tassara A., 2012. Darwin seismic gap closed by the 2010 Maule earthquake. Andean Geology 39 (3), 558–563. https://doi.org/10.5027/andgeoV39n3-a11.

15. Métois M., Socquet A., Vigny C., Carrizo D., Peyrat S., Delorme A., Maureira E., Valderas-Bermejoand C.-M., Ortega I., 2013. Revisiting the North Chile seismic gap segmentation using GPS-derived interseismic coupling. Geophysical Journal International 194 (3), 1283–1294. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt183.

16. Moreno M.S., Bolte J., Klotz J., Melnick D., 2009. Impact of megathrust geometry on inversion of coseismic slip from geodetic data: Application to the 1960 Chile earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters 36 (16), L16310. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039276.

17. Moreno M., Melnick D., Rosenau M., Baez J., Klotz J., Oncken O., Tassara A., Chen J., Bataille K., Bevis M., Socquet A., Bolte J., Vigny C., Brooks B., Rider I., Grund V., Smalley B., Carrizo D., Bartsch M., Hase H., 2012. Toward understanding tectonic control on the Mw 8.8 2010 Maule Chile earthquake. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 321–322, 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.01.006.

18. Moscoso E., Contreras-Reyes E., 2012. Outer rise seismicity related to the Maule, Chile 2010 megathrust earthquake and hydration of the incoming oceanic lithosphere. Andean Geology 39 (3), 564–572. https://doi.org/10.5027/andgeoV39n3-a12.

19. Osokina D.N., Friedman V.N., 1987. The study of structural regularities of the stress field in the vicinity of the shear rupture with friction of its sides. In: Yu.D. Bulanzhe (Ed.), Fields of stress and strain in the Earth’s crust. Nauka, Moscow, p. 74–119 (in Russian) [Осокина Д.Н., Фридман В.Н. Исследование закономерностей строения поля напряжений в окрестностях сдвигового разрыва с трением между берегами // Поля напряжений и деформаций в земной коре / Ред. Ю.Д. Буланже. М.: Наука, 1987. С. 74−119].

20. Osokina D.N., Tsvetkova N.Yu., 1979. Local stress fields and prediction of secondary failure in vicinities of faults and at earthquake sources with regard to the third principal stress. In: A.S. Grigor’ev, D.N. Osokina (Eds.), Lithospheric stress and strain fields. Nauka, Moscow, p. 163–184 (in Russian) [Осокина Д.Н., Цветкова Н.Ю., 1979. Изучение локального поля напряжений и прогноз вторичных нарушений в окрестностях тектонических разрывов и в очагах землетрясений с учетом третьего главного напряжения // Поля напряжений и деформаций в литосфере / Ред. А.С. Григорьев, Д.Н. Осокина. М.: Наука, С. 163–184].

21. Rebetsky Y., Tatevossian R., 2013. Rupture propagation in strong earthquake sources and tectonic stress field. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 184 (4–5), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.184.4-5.335.

22. Rietbrock A., Ryder I., Hayes G., Haberland C., Comte D., Roecker S., Lyon-Caen H., 2012. Aftershock seismicity of the 2010 Maule Mw=8.8, Chile, earthquake: Correlation between co-seismic slip models and aftershock distribution? Geophysical Research Letters 39 (8), L08310. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051308.

23. Riznichenko Yu.V., 1985. Problems of Seismology. Nauka, Moscow, 408 p. (in Russian) [Ризниченко Ю.В. Проблемы сейсмологии. М.: Наука, 1985. 408 с.]

24. Ruegg J.C., Rudloff A., Vigny C., de Chabalier J.B., Campos J., Kausel E., Barrientos S., Dimitrov D., 2009. Interseismic strain accumulation measured by GPS in the seismic gap between Concepcion-Constitucion in Chile. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 175 (1–2), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2008.02.015.

25. Ruiz J.A., Contreras-Reyes E., 2015. Outer rise seismicity boosted by the Maule 2010 Mw 8.8 megathrust earthquake. Tectonophysics 653, 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2015.04.007.

26. Sánchez L., Seitz D.M., 2011. Recent activities of the IGS Regional Network Associate Analysis Centre for SIRGAS (IGS RNAAC SIR). Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut der Technischen Universität München, PANGAEA, Report No. 87, 48 p. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.835100.

27. Tassara A., Echaurren A., 2012. Anatomy of the Andean subduction zone: three-dimensional density model upgraded and compared against global-scale models. Geophysical Journal International 189 (1), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05397.x.

28. USGS Earthquake Hazards Program, 2017. NEIC catalog search. Available from: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/ (last accessed August 14, 2017).

29. Xiaoshan W., Guiling D., Xiangdong F., Yaqiong Y., 2012. Characteristics of focal mechanisms in Chile subduction. Geodesy and Geodynamics 3 (3), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1246.2012.00023.