On the Crustal Sources of Magnetic Anomalies in the Middle Urals
https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2024-15-3-0763
EDN: JSSZJC
Abstract
The 800×500 sq km area of the the Middle Urals, Russia, lying between 56 to 60° northern latitude and 54 to 66° eastern longitude, was studied in terms of the deep crustal structure. The study was based on three-dimensional modeling of the sources of magnetic anomalies in three layers of the Earth’s crust. The studied area covers the folded region of the Urals and adjacent structures of the East European Platform and the West Siberian Plate. The sources modeled in the near-surface layer down to a depth of 5 km make it possible to clarify the position of magnetized massifs, mainly consisting of mafic-ultrabasic rocks, and to trace their connection with mafic-ultrabasic belts in the granite layer and root blocks in the lower basaltic layer of the Earth’s crust. When the sources in the upper crustal layer are compared with those in the lower crustal layer, it is apparent that many belts on the platform have deep-seated roots and are located above the basalt layer protrusions, while most of the massifs in the Urals do not have deep-seated roots. The springs located under the western slope of the Urals allow reliably determining the depth to the basement of the ancient platform and the location of the eastern border of the East European Platform in the lower layer of the Earth’s crust. There were found extended zones of subsidence of the roof of the lower magnetized layer, which probably mark the boundaries of various terrains forming the paleo-island arc sector of the Ural fold system. The most extensive subsidence of the roof of the lower layer occurs to the west of the Tyumen-Chudinovsky fault and is perhaps the eastern deep-seated dividing line between the Ural fold system and the West Siberian Plate.
About the Authors
P. S. MartyshkoRussian Federation
100 Amundsen St, Ekaterinburg 620016
N. V. Fedorova
Russian Federation
100 Amundsen St, Ekaterinburg 620016
A. L. Rublev
Russian Federation
Alexey L. Rublev
100 Amundsen St, Ekaterinburg 620016
References
1. Baranov V.A., 1957. New Method for Interpretation of Aeromagnetic Maps: Pseudo-Gravimetric Anomalies. Geophysics 22 (2), 225–441. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438369.
2. Bhattacharyya B.K., 1965. Two-Dimensional Harmonic Analysis as a Tool for Magnetic Interpretation. Geophysics 30 (5), 705–932. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439658.
3. Chursin A.V., Prutyan A.M., Fedorova N.V., 2008. Digital Map of the Anomalous Magnetic Field of the Northern, Middle and Southern Urals and Adjacent Territories of the East European and West Siberian Platforms. Lithosphere 6, 63–72 (in Russian)
4. Druzhinin V.S., Karetin Yu.S., Dyakonova A.G., Kashubin S.N., Kashubina T.V., Kolmogorova V.V., Kukhmazov S.U., Parygin G.I., Osipov V.Yu., 2003. Integrated Geophysical Studies of the Middle Urals Lithosphere along the Artinsky Transect. National Geology 1, 65–73 (in Russian)
5. Druzhinin V.S., Karetin Yu.S., Rybalka V.M., Khalevin N.I., 1981. New Data on the Deep Structure of the Urals (Based on the Results of Research on the Krasnouralsk DSS Profile). Doklady of the USSR Academy of Sciences 258 (1), 173–176 (in Russian)
6. Druzhinin V.S., Kashubin S.N., Valchak V.I., Kashubina T.V., Rybalka A.V., 1985. The Deep Structure of the Urals along the Meridional DSS Profile Nizhnyaya Tura – Orsk. Soviet Geology 1, 74–86 (in Russian)
7. Fedorova N.V., 2001. Models of the Earth’s Crust Magnetization along the Geotraverse Granite. Ural Geophysical Bulletin 2, 88–93 (in Russian)
8. Fedorova N.V., 2005. Modeling of the Magnetic Field Variation in Relation to the Origin of the Manchazh Secular Trend Anomaly. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 41 (5), 355–362.
9. Fedorova N.V., Muravyev L.A., Kolmogorova V.V., 2017a. Statistical Estimations of the Relationship of Regional Magnetic Anomalies with Seismic Borders of the Urals Region Nether-Polar Sector. Ural Geophysical Bulletin 1 (29), 47–51 (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.25698/UGV.2017.1.12027.
10. Fedorova N.V., Rublev A.L., 2019. Numerical Modeling of the Sources of Magnetic Anomalies in the South Urals Earth’s Crust. Russian Geology and Geophysics 60 (11), 1310–1318. https://doi.org/10.15372/RGG2019106.
11. Fedorova N.V., Rublev A.L., Muravyev L.A., Kolmogorova V.V., 2017b. Magnetic Anomalies and Model of the Magnetization in the Earth’s Crust of Circumpolar and Polar the Sectors of Ural Region. Geophysical Journal 39 (1), 111–122. DOI:10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v39i1.2017.94014.
12. Igolkina G.V., 2002. Borehole Magnetometry in Investigation of Deep and Superdeep Boreholes. Publishing House of the Ural Branch of RAS, Ekaterinburg, 221 p. (in Russian)
13. Ivanov K.S., Puchkov V.N., 2022. Structural-Formational Zoning of the Ural Fold Belt: An Overview and New Approach. Geotectonics 56, 747–780. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0016852122060036.
14. Kashubin S.N. (Ed.), 2002. Geotraverse GRANITE. East European Platform – Ural – West Siberia (Crustal Structure Based on Results of Complex Geological and Geophysical Studies). Ekaterinburg, 312 p. (in Russian)
15. Kostiuchenko S.L., Egorkin A.V., Solodilov L.N., 1998. The Lithospheric Structure beneath the Urals: Evidence from Multiwave Deep Seismic Sounding. Geotectonics 32 (4), 3–18 (in Russian)
16. Krutikhovskaya Z.A., Pashkevich I.K., Silina I.M., 1982. Magnetic Model and Structure of the Earth’s Crust of the Ukrainian Shield. Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 216 p. (in Russian)
17. Main Results of Deep and Ultra-Deep Drilling in Russia, 2000. VSEGEI Publishing House, Saint Petersburg, 111 p. (in Russian) [Основные результаты глубокого и сверхглубокого бурения в России. СПб.: Изд-во ВСЕГЕИ, 2000. 111 с.].
18. Martyshko P.S., Fedorova N.V., Akimova E.N., Gemaidinov D.V., 2014. Studying the Structural Features of the Lithospheric Magnetic and Gravity Fields with the Use of Parallel Algorithms. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 50, 508–513. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351314040090.
19. Martyshko P.S., Fedorova N.V., Byzov D.D., 2021a. Computer Technology for Separating Lithospheric Magnetic Anomalies. In: Geoinformatics: Theoretical and Applied Aspects. Proceedings of 20th International Conference (May 11–14, 2021). EAGE, p. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20215521087.
20. Martyshko P.S., Fedorova N.V., Rublev A.L., 2021b. Numerical Algorithms for Structural Magnetometry Inverse Problem Solving. Russian Journal of Earth Sciences 21, ES3002. https://doi.org/10.2205/2021ES000766.
21. Martyshko P.S., Ladovsky I.V., Fedorova N.V., Byzov D.D., Tsidaev A.G., 2016. Theory and Methods of Complex Interpretation of Geophysical Data. Publishing House of the Ural Branch of RAS, Ekaterinburg, 94 p. (in Russian)
22. Mazur V.B. (Ed.), 1996. Tyumen Superdeep Borehole (Interval 0–7502 m): Drilling and Research Results. Collection of Scientific Papers of the Meeting (February 21–23, 1995). KamNIIKIGS, Perm, 376 p. (in Russian)
23. Moiseenko U.I., Smyslov A.A., 1986. Temperature of the Earth’s Subsurface. Nedra, Leningrad, 180 p. (in Russian)
24. Muravyev L., Byzov D., Fedorova N., 2016. Approximation of Anomalous Magnetic Field Using Array of Singular Sources (Magnetized Rods). In: Geoinformatics: Theoretical and Applied Aspects. Proceedings of 15th International Conference (May 10–13, 2016, Kiev, Ukraine). EAGE, p. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201600520.
25. Orlov V.P., Laverov N.P. (Eds), 1998. Kola Superdeep. Scientific Results and Research Experiences. Tekhnoneftegaz, Moscow, 260 p. (in Russian)
26. Orlyuk M.A., Romenets A.A., Bakarzhieva M.I., Marchenko A.V., Lebed T.V., 2014. Study of Dynamics of Geomagnetic Field at the Area of Chernigov Regional Anomaly. Bulletin of the Perm University 3 (24), 48–59 (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.17072/psu.geol.24.48.
27. Pechersky D.M. (Ed.), 1994. A Petromagnetic Model of the Lithosphere. Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 175 p. (in Russian)
28. Pechersky D.M., Orlyuk M.I., Pashkevich I.K., 2006. Magnetism of the Lower Continental Crust: Development of Research Results and Ideas of Z.A. Krutikhovskaya. Geophysical Journal 28 (5), 40–51 (in Russian)
29. Petrophysical Methods of Searching and Studying Iron Ore Deposits in the Urals, 1988. Guidelines. Sverdlovsk, 228 p. (in Russian)
30. Puchkov V.N., 2010. Geology of the Urals and Cisurals (Topical Issues of Stratigraphy, Tectonics, Geodynamics and Metallogeny). DizaynPoligrafServis, Ufa, 280 p. (in Russian)
31. Rylkov S.A., Rybalka A.V., Ivanov K.S., 2013. Deep Structure and Metallogeny of the Urals: The Comparison of Deep Structure of Southern, Middle and Polar Urals. Lithosphere 1, 3–16 (in Russian)
32. Sokolov V.B., 1996. Results and Problems of Studying the Earth’s Crust of the Urals Using the Method of Reflected Waves. In: Deep Structure and Development of the Urals. Nauka, Ekaterinburg, p. 111–123 (in Russian)
33. State Geological Map of the Russian Federation, 2011. Urals Series. Scale of 1:1000000. Sheet O-41 (Ekaterinburg). VSEGEI, Saint Petersburg (in Russian)
34. State Geological Map of the Russian Federation, 2015. Urals Series. Scale of 1:1000000. Sheet O-40 (Perm). VSEGEI, Saint Petersburg (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Martyshko P.S., Fedorova N.V., Rublev A.L. On the Crustal Sources of Magnetic Anomalies in the Middle Urals. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2024;15(3):0763. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2024-15-3-0763. EDN: JSSZJC