RESULTS OF THE TECTONOPHYSICAL STUDY IN THE DZHANKHOT THRUST ZONE (NORTHWESTERN CAUCASUS)

The paper presents the results of detailed structural analysis of the Dzhankhot thrust zone which is a part of the system of overthrust nappe structures in the southern slope of the Northwestern Caucasus. The relevance of the research topic is found on the reason that despite the obvious importance of these overthrust nappes in the structure of the Greater Caucasus there is still lack of in-situ observational data on the detailed structure of thrust zones and on tectonic stress distribution pattern therein.

As a result of the structural and geological studies of small disjunctive and plicative forms in the Upper Cretaceous and Paleocene sediment contact along the Dzhankhot thrust, there were identified the major structural and tectonic deformation patterns and the areal distribution of tectonic deformations depending on the distance to the thrust. There was determined the major type of stress in different parts of the thrust zone. There was shown the difference in the development of geological indicators of faults for different elements of the folded structures. In some cases, there was determined the sequence of deformations, from synsedimentary structures (clastic dikes in particular) to post-sedimentary brittle structures.

The orientation of principal stress axes determined from the reconstruction data by method of cataclastic analysis of faults confirms a thrust-type deformation within the studied area near the Dzhankhot thrust. Local stress-tensor determinations are in good agreement with the location of observation points in the regional tectonic structure. Trajectories of the maximum compression axes, most of which are submeridionally and NNW-trending, change orientation to the northwest in the immediate vicinity of the Dzhankhot thrust fault zone. The identified features of tectonic structure and stressed-strained state of the Dzhankhot thrust zone allow considering this area as a natural structural and tectonophysical testing ground for both tectonic-stress-reconstruction-improvement methodologies and a study on natural deformation structures of the Greater Caucasus.

1. Angelier J., 1979. Determination of the Mean Principal Directions of Stresses for a Given Fault Population. Tectonophysics 56 (3–4), Т17–Т26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(79)90081-7.

2. Borukaev Ch.B., 1964. Tectonic Structure of the Southeastern Part of the Novorossiysk Synclinorium (Northwestern Caucasus) and History of Its Formation. Brief PhD Thesis (Candidate of Geology and Mineralogy). Moscow, 16 p. (in Russian).

3. Borukaev Ch.B., 1970. On Palinspastic Reconstructions. Geotectonics 6, 23–29 (in Russian).

4. Giorgobiani T.V., Zakaraya D.P., 1989. Folded Structure of the Northwestern Caucasus and Its Formation Mechanism. Metzniereba, Tbilisi, 60 p. (in Russian).

5. Gushchenko O.I., 1975. Kinematic Principle of the Reconstruction of Principal Stress Axes (from the Geological and Seismological Data). Doklady of the USSR Academy of Sciences 225 (3), 557–560 (in Russian).

6. Khain V.E., Afanasyev S.L., Borukaev Ch.B., Lomize M.G., 1962. The Main Features of Structural-Facial Zonation and Tectonic History of the Northwestern Caucasus. In: Geology of Central and Northwestern Caucasus. Vol. 3. Gostoptechizdat, Moscow, p. 5–47 (in Russian).

7. Marinin A.V., 2001. On Tectodynamic Formation Conditions of the Dzhankhot Area of the Novorossiysk Synclinorium (Northwestern Caucasus). In: Modern Issues of Geotectonics. Collection of Scientific Papers Conference Dedicated to the 90th Anniversary of Academician A.L. Yanshin. Nauchny Mir, Moscow, p. 122–125 (in Russian).

8. Marinin A.V., 2003. Tectonic Features of the Seversk and Psekup Steps (Northwestern Caucasus). Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists. Geological Section 2, 22–24 (in Russian).

9. Osokina D.N., 2000. The Study of Deformation Mechanisms of the Massif in the Rupture Zone Based on 3D Stress Field (mathematic modeling). In: Yu.G. Leonov (Ed.), M.V. Gzovsky and the Development of Tectonophysics. Nauka, Moscow, p. 220–245 (in Russian).

10. Rastsvetaev L.M., 1987. Structural-Paragenetic Analysis of Disjunctive Tectonic Faults. In: A.V. Peive, A.V. Lukyanov (Eds), Problems of Structural Geology and Physics of Tectonic Processes. Moscow, p. 173–235 (in Russian).

11. Rastsvetaev L.M., Marinin A. V., Tveritinova T.Yu., 2010. Late-Alpine Fault Systems and Geodynamics of the West Caucasus. Izvestia, Physics of the Solid Earth 46, 394–403. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351310050046.

12. Rebetsky Yu.L., 2007. Tectonic Stresses and Strength of Mountain Ranges. Nauka, Moscow, 406 p. (in Russian).

13. Rebetsky Yu.L., 2020. The Current State of Crustal Stresses in the Caucasus According to the Unified Catalogue of Earthquake Focal Mechanisms. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 11 (1), 17–29 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2020-11-1-0459.

14. Rebetsky Yu.L., Sim L.A., Marinin A.V., 2017. From Slickensides to Tectonic Stress. Techniques and Algorithms. GEOS, Moscow, 234 p. (in Russian).

15. State Geological Map of the Russian Federation, 2002. Caucasus Series. Scale 1:200000. Sheet L-37-ХХХIV (Tuapse). Explanatory Note. VSEGEI Publishing House, Saint Petersburg, 151 p. (in Russian).