Preview

Geodynamics & Tectonophysics

Advanced search

THE FIRST SM-ND ISOTOPIC DATA FOR METAMORPHIC ROCKS OF THE GUDJAL BLOCK IN THE EASTERN PART OF BUREYA CONTINENTAL MASSIF

https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2022-13-1-0574

Abstract

It is the first time that there have been Sm-Nd isotopic geochemical studies conducted into the metamorphic rocks of the Gudjal block considered as a basement protrusion of the Bureya continental massif. It has been found that biotite and garnet-amphibole schists of the Gudjal formation are characterized by strongly negative εNd(0)=–15.7…–17.2 values and Paleoproterozoic values of Nd model age of tNd(DM)=2.4–2.1 Ga. Similar isotopic parameters are also typical of gneissic biotite granodiorites: εNd(0)=–18.7, tNd(DM)=1.8 Ga. Out of orthorocks of the Gudjal block studied, the Neoproterozoic orthogneisses and orthoamphibolites of the Tulovchikha formation and the Neoproterozoic gneiss-granites of the Nyatyngran complex of the Paleoproterozoic model age may be considered as a probable substrate for melts.

About the Authors

R. O. Ovchinnikov
Institute of Geology and Nature Management, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Roman O. Ovchinnikov

1 Relochniy ln, Blagoveshchensk 675000


A. A. Sorokin
Institute of Geology and Nature Management, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
1 Relochniy ln, Blagoveshchensk 675000


V. P. Kovach
Institute of Precambrian geology and geochronology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
2 Makarov Emb, Saint Petersburg, 199034


W. L. Xu
College of Earth Sciences of Jilin University
China
2199 Jianshe St, Changchun 130061


References

1. Goldstein S.J., Jacobsen S.B., 1988. Nd and Sr Isotopic Systematics of Rivers Water Suspended Material: Implications for Crustal Evolution. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 87 (3), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(88)90013-1.

2. Jacobsen S.B., Wasserburg G.J., 1984. Sm-Nd Evolution of Chondrites and Achondrites. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 67 (2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(84)90109-2.

3. Khanchuk A.I. (Ed.), 2006. Geodynamics, Magmatism and Metallogeny of the Eastern Regions of Russia. Book 1. Dal’nauka, Vladivostok, 572 p. (in Russian)

4. Ovchinnikov R.O., Sorokin A.A., Kovach V.P., Kotov A.B., 2020. Late Paleozoic Age and Nature of Protolith of Metamorphic Rocks of the Dyagdagle Formation, Bureya Terrane, Central Asian Fold Belt. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 28, 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869593820030089.

5. Parfenov L.M., Berzin N.A., Khanchuk A.I., Badarch G., Belichenko V.G., Bulgatov A.N., Dril S.I., Kirillova G.L. et al., 2003. Model of the Formation of Orogenic Belts in Central and North-East Asia. Pacific Geology 22 (6), 7–41 (in Russian)

6. Shan H., Zhai M., Zhu X., Santosh M., Hong T., Ge S., 2016. Zircon U-Pb and Lu-Hf Isotopic and Geochemical Constrains on the Origin of the Paragneisses from the Jiaobei Terrane, North China Craton. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 115, 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.10.003.

7. Shilo N.K. (Ed.), 1982. Resolutions of the III Interdepartmental Stratigraphical Conference on the Precambrian and Phanerozoic of the USSR Far East. A Set of Schemes. SVPGO, Magadan, 182 p. (in Russian)

8. Sorokin A.A., Ovchinnikov R.O., Kudryashov N.M., Kotov A.B., Kovach V.P., 2017. Two Stages of Neoproterozoic Magmatism in the Evolution of the Bureya Continental Massif of the Central Asian Fold Belt. Russian Geology and Geophysics 58 (10), 1171–1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2016.12.009.

9. Sorokin A.A., Ovchinnikov R.O., Xu W., Kovach V.P., Yang H., Kotov A.B., Ponomarchuk V.A., Travin A.V., Plotkina Yu. V., 2019. Ages and Nature of the Protolith of the Tulovchikha Metamorphic Complex in the Bureya Massif, Central Asian Orogenic Belt, Russia: Evidence from U-Th-Pb, Lu-Hf, Sm-Nd and 40Ar/39Ar Data. Lithos 332–333, 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2019.03.001.

10. State Geological Map of the Russian Federation, 2004. Bureya Series. Scale 1:200000. Sheet M-53-XIV (Suluk). VSEGEI Publishing House, Saint Petersburg (in Russian)

11. State Geological Map of the Russian Federation, 2006. Far Eastern Series. Scale 1:1000000. Sheet M-52 (Blagoveshchensk). VSEGEI Publishing House, Saint Petersburg (in Russian)

12. State Geological Map of the Russian Federation, 2009. Far Eastern Series. Scale 1:1000000. Sheet M-53 (Khabarovsk). VSEGEI Publishing House, Saint Petersburg (in Russian)

13. State Geological Map of the USSR, 1962a. Bureya Series. Scale 1:200000. Sheet M-53-XIII. VSEGEI Publishing House, Leningrad (in Russian)

14. State Geological Map of the USSR, 1962b. Bureya Series. Scale 1:200000. Sheet M-53-XIV (Suluk). VSEGEI Publishing House, Leningrad (in Russian)

15. Turbine M.T. (Ed.), 1994. Resolutions of the IV Interdepartmental Regional Stratigraphical Conference on the Precambrian and Phanerozoic of the Southern Part of the Russian Far East and Eastern Transbaikalia. A Set of Schemes. Dal’geologiya, Khabarovsk, 124 p. (in Russian)

16. Velikoslavinskii S.D., Glebovitskii V.A., Krylov D.P., 2013. Separation between Sedimentary and Magmatic Silicate Rocks by Discriminant Analysis of Major Element Contents. Doklady Earth Sciences 453, 1150–1153. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X13110238.

17. Yang H., Xu W.L., Sorokin A.A., Ovchinnikov R.O., Ge W., 2020. Geochronology and Geochemistry of Neoproterozoic Magmatism in the Bureya Block, Russian Far East: Petrogenesis and Implications for Rodinia Reconstruction. Precambrian Research 342, 105676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105676.


Review

For citations:


Ovchinnikov R.O., Sorokin A.A., Kovach V.P., Xu W.L. THE FIRST SM-ND ISOTOPIC DATA FOR METAMORPHIC ROCKS OF THE GUDJAL BLOCK IN THE EASTERN PART OF BUREYA CONTINENTAL MASSIF. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2022;13(1):0574. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2022-13-1-0574

Views: 519


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-502X (Online)