Preview

Geodynamics & Tectonophysics

Advanced search

Tectonic stress in the structures of the Northern Priokhotie (Magadan region) according to geological data

https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2021-12-1-0516

Abstract

Tectonic fracturing of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic structures was studied in the Northern Priokhotie (Magadan region). The cataclastic analysis method and the statistical method of fracture density analysis were used to reconstruct their state of stress. It is revealed that the folded structures of the Arman’-Viliga synclinorium are subjected to horizontal shearing; the axis of maximum compression is sublatitudinal (azimuth 67°, angle 12°); extension is submeridional (azimuth 161°, angle 19°). In the Uda-Murgal volcanic arc, horizontal extension with shear takes place; the compression axis is directed to NW (azimuth 259°, angle 29°), and the extension axis to NE (azimuth 152°, angle 26°). In the Okhotsk-Chukotka volcanogenic belt, volcanic structures are in the field of varying tectonic stresses, from predominant horizontal extension to horizontal shear. The Cenozoic intermontane depressions of the Miocene – Pliocene ages are subjected to horizontal shear; the compression axis is directed to NE (azimuth 214°, angle 29°), and the extension axis to NW (azimuth 121°, angle 4°). The results of the comparative analysis of the stress states in the above-mentioned areas reliably show that the diversity of the stress state types is statistically related to the structural positions of the studies sites. Such diversity cannot be explained by an influence of active faults, or by any consecutive superposition of deformations at different stages, despite the fact that the deformations have complicated the observed pattern of the stress states. We conclude that each subsequent geodynamic stage only introduced additional elements into the previous structure, but did not completely transform it.

About the Author

M. N. Kondratyev
Shilo North-East Interdisciplinary Scientific Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

16 Portovaya St, Magadan 685017



References

1. Akinin V.V., Miller E.L., 2011. Evolution of Calc-Alkaline Magmatism of the Okhotsk-Chkotka Volcanogenic Belt. Petrology 19 (3), 249–292 (in Russian) [Акинин В.В., Миллер Э.Л. Эволюция известково-щелочного магматизма Охотско-Чукотского вулканогенного пояса // Петрология. 2011. Т. 19. № 3. С. 249–292].

2. Fujita K., Koz’min B.M., Mackey K.G., Riege S.A., McLean M.S., Imaev V.S., 2009. Seismotectonics of the Chersky Seismic Belt, Eastern Sakha Republic (Yakutia and Magadan District, Russia). In: D.B. Stone, K. Fujita, P.W. Layer, E.L. Miller, A.V. Prokopiev, J. Toro (Eds), Geology, Geophysics and Tectonics of Northeastern Russia: A Tribute to Leonid Parfenov. Stephan Mueller Special Publication Series 4, 117–145. https://doi.org/10.5194/smsps-4-117-2009.

3. Goryachev N.A., 2005. The Uda-Murgal Magmatic Arc: Geology, Magmatism, Metallogeny. In: V.I. Goncharov, V.M. Kuznetsov (Eds), Problems of Metallogeny of Ore Regions of the Northeastern Regions of Russia. North East Interdisciplinary Scientific Research Institute FEB RAS, Magadan, 17–37 (in Russian) [Горячев Н.А. Удско-Мургальская магматическая дуга: геология, магматизм, металлогения // Проблемы металлогении рудных районов северо-востока России / Ред. В.И. Гончаров, В.М. Кузнецов. Магадан: СВКНИИ ДВО РАН, 2005. С. 17–37].

4. Grinenko O.V., Sergeenok A.I., Belolyubsky I.N., 1998. Paleogene and Neogene of the Northeastern Regions of Russia. Vol. 1. Yakutian Scientific Center SB RAS, Yakutsk, 36 p. (in Russian) [Гриненко О.В., Сергеенок А.И., Белолюбский И.Н. Палеоген и неоген северо-востока России. Якутск: ЯНЦ СО РАН, 1998. Ч. 1. 36 с.].

5. Hindle D., Fujita K., Mackey K.G., 2009. Deformation of the Northwestern Okhotsk Plate: How Is It Happening? In: D.B. Stone, K. Fujita, P.W. Layer, E.L. Miller, A.V. Prokopiev, J. Toro (Eds), Geology, Geophysics and Tectonics of Northeastern Russia: A Tribute to Leonid Parfenov. Stephan Mueller Publication Series 4, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.5194/smsps-4-147-2009.

6. Hindle D., Mackey K., 2011. Earthquake Recurrence and Magnitude and Seismic Deformation of the Northwestern Okhotsk Plate, Northeast Russia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 116 (В2) https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007409.

7. Khanchuk A.I. (Ed.), 2006. Geodynamics, Magmatism and Metallogeny of the Eastern Regions of Russia. Dal’nauka, Vladivostok, 981 p. (in Russian) [Геодинамика, магматизм и металлогения востока России / Ред. А.И. Ханчук. Владивосток: Дальнаука, 2006. 981 с.].

8. Kondratyev M.N., 2015. The Use of an Additional Statistical Criterion for Assessing the Reliability of the Choice of Conjugated Planes in the Analysis of Fracture Matrices by the Nikolaev Method. In: Modern Tectonophysics. Methods and Results. Materials of the Fourth Youth Tectonophysical School–Workshop (October 05–09, 2015). Vol. 1. IPE, Moscow, p. 162–165 (in Russian) [Кондратьев М.Н. Использование дополнительного статистического критерия для оценки достоверности выбора сопряженных плоскостей при анализе матриц трещиноватости методом Николаева // Современная тектонофизика. Методы и результаты: Материалы Четвертой молодежной тектонофизической школы-семинара (05–09 октября 2015 г.). М.: ИФЗ, 2015. Т. 1. С. 162–165].

9. Kondratyev M.N., 2019. Comparative Analysis of Tectonic Stresses in the Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic Structures of Northern Priokhotie. Brief PhD Thesis (Candidate of Geology and Mineralogy). Magadan, 24 p. (in Russian) [Кондратьев М.Н. Сравнительный анализ тектонических напряжений в структурах позднего мезозоя и кайнозоя в Северном Приохотье: Автореф. дис … канд. геол.-мин. наук. Магадан, 2019. 24 с.].

10. Kondratyev M.N., Smirnov V.N., 2013. Tectonic Stress Fields in the Basement Structures of the Okhotsk-Chukotka Volcanogenic Belt (Northern Priokhotye). Bulletin of the North-Eastern Scientific Center of FEB RAS 4, 23–27 (in Russian) [Кондратьев М.Н., Смирнов В.Н. Поля тектонических напряжений в структурах основания Охотско-Чукотского вулканогенного пояса (Северное Приохотье) // Вестник СВНЦ ДВО РАН. 2013. № 4. С. 23–27].

11. Kotlyar I.N., Rusakova T.B., 2004. Cretaceous Magmatism and Ore Potential of the Okhotsk-Chukotka Region: Geological and Geochronological Correlation. North East Interdisciplinary Scientific Research Institute FEB RAS, Magadan, 152 p. (in Russian) [Котляр И.Н., Русакова Т.Б. Меловой магматизм и рудоносность Охотско-Чукотской области: геолого-геохронологическая корреляция. Магадан: СВКНИИ ДВО РАН, 2004. 152 c.].

12. Nikolaev P.N., 1977. Methods of Statistical Analysis of Fractures and Reconstruction of Tectonic Stresses. Proceedings of Higher Educational Establishments. Geology and Exploration 12, 103–115 (in Russian) [Николаев П.Н. Методика статистического анализа трещин и реконструкция полей напряжений // Известия вузов. Геология и разведка. 1977. № 12. С. 103–115].

13. Rebetsky Yu.L., Sim L.A., Marinin A.V., 2017. From Slickensides to Tectonic Stress. Techniques and Algorithms. GEOS, Moscow, 234 p. (in Russian) [Ребецкий Ю.Л., Сим Л.А., Маринин А.В. От зеркал скольжения к тектоническим напряжениям. Методики и алгоритмы. М.: ГЕОС, 2017. 234 с.].

14. Riegel S., Fujita K., Koz’min B.M., Imaev V.S., Cook D.B., 1993. Extrusion Tectonics of the Okhotsk Plate, Northeast Asia. Geophysical Research Letters 20 (7), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1029/93GL00267.

15. Seno T., Sakurai T., Stein S., 1996. Can the Okhotsk Plate Be Discriminated from the North American Plate? Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 101 (B5) 11305–11315. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JB00532.

16. Sim L.A., 1982. Determination of the Regional Stress Field from the Data on Local Stress Fields on Separate Sites (Example of the Junction Zone of the Mezen Syneclise and the Middle Timan). Proceedings of Higher Educational Establishments. Geology and Exploration 4, 35–40 (in Russian) [Сим Л.А. Определение регионального поля напряжений по данным о локальных полях напряжений на отдельных участках (на примере зоны сочленения Мезенской синеклизы и Среднего Тимана) // Известия вузов. Геология и разведка. 1982. № 4. С. 35–40].

17. Smirnov V.N., 2006. Geological Structure, Modern Tectonics and Seismic Activity. In: Landscapes, Climate and Natural Resources of the Tauis Bay, the Sea of Okhotsk. Dal’nauka, Vladivostok, p. 39–50 (in Russian) [Смирнов В.Н. Геологическое строение, новейшая тектоника и сейсмическая активность // Ландшафты, климат и природные ресурсы Тауйской губы Охотского моря. Владивосток: Дальнаука, 2006. С. 39–50].

18. Smirnov V.N., Glushkova O.Yu., Kolegov P.P., Kondratyev M.N., 2017. Paleoseismic Dislocations in the Dondychan River Basin (Northern Priokhotye). Bulletin of the North-Eastern Scientific Center of FEB RAS 2, 41–50 (in Russian) [Смирнов В.Н., Глушкова О.Ю., Колегов П.П., Кондратьев М.Н. Палеосейсмодислокации в бассейне р. Дондычан (Северное Приохотье) // Вестник СВНЦ ДВО РАН. 2017. № 2. С. 41–50].

19. Smirnov V.N., Glushkova O.Yu., Pakhomov A. Yu., 2000. Landslide Processes in the Zone of the Nagaev Active Fault (City of Magadan Area). In: Proceedings of IV Shchukin Readings. Geomorphology on the Edge of the 21st Century. Publishing House of Geographical Faculty of MSU, Moscow, p. 88–92 (in Russian) [Смирнов В.Н., Глушкова О.Ю., Пахомов А.Ю. Оползневые процессы в зоне Нагаевского активного разлома (район г. Магадана) // IV Щукинские чтения: Геоморфология на рубеже XXI века: Труды Всероссийской конференции. М.: Изд-во географического факультета МГУ, 2000. С. 340–343].

20. Smirnov V.N., Kondratyev M.N., 2011. The Stress Field and Inner Structures of the Khetinsky Active Fault Area. Bulletin of the North-Eastern Scientific Center of FEB RAS 4, 65–72 (in Russian) [Смирнов В.Н., Кондратьев М.Н. Поле напряжений и внутренняя структура Хетинского активного разлома // Вестник СВНЦ ДВО РАН. 2011. № 4. С. 65–72].

21. Smirnov V.N., Kondratyev M.N., Kolegov P.P., 2018. A Large Paleoseismodislocation in the Southeastern Part of the Cherskii Seismic Belt, Northern Priokhotye. Doklady Earth Sciences 479 (2), 425–428. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X18040104.

22. State Geological Map, 1992. Scale 1:1 000 000. Sheets 0-56 (Magadan), P-56, P-57 (Seimchan). Explanatory Note. VSEGEI, Saint Petersburg, 112 p. (in Russian) [Государственная геологическая карта. Масштаб 1:1 000 000. Листы О-56 (Магадан), P-56, P-57 (Сеймчан): Объяснительная записка. СПб.: ВСЕГЕИ, 1992. 112 с.].

23. State Geological Map, 2001. Scale 1:200 000. Magadan Series. Sheets P-56-XXXI, XXXII, O-56-I, O-56-II. Explanatory Note. VSEGEI, Saint Petersburg, 258 p. (in Russian) [Государственная геологическая карта. Серия Магаданская. Масштаб 1:200 000. Листы P-56-XXXI, XXXII, O-56-I, О-56-II: Объяснительная записка. СПб.: ВСЕГЕИ, 2001. 258 с.].

24. State Geological Map of the Russian Federation, 2008. Verkhoyansk-Kolyma Series. Scale 1:1 000 000. Sheet P-56 (Seimchan). VSEGEI, Saint Petersburg (in Russian) [Государственная геологическая карта Российской Федерации. Масштаб 1:1 000 000. Серия Верхояно-Колымская. Лист Р-56 (Сеймчан). СПб.: ВСЕГЕИ, 2008].


Review

For citations:


Kondratyev M.N. Tectonic stress in the structures of the Northern Priokhotie (Magadan region) according to geological data. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2021;12(1):112-124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2021-12-1-0516

Views: 788


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-502X (Online)