gtcrustГеодинамика и тектонофизикаGeodynamics & Tectonophysics2078-502XInstitute of the Earth's crust of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch10.5800/GT-2022-13-2-0593gtcrust-1415Research ArticleСтатьиЦЕНТР КОЛЛЕКТИВНОГО ПОЛЬЗОВАНИЯ «СОЛНЕЧНО-ЗЕМНАЯ ФИЗИКА И КОНТРОЛЬ ОКОЛОЗЕМНОГО КОСМИЧЕСКОГО ПРОСТРАНСТВА» (ЦКП «АНГАРА») ПРИ ГЕОДИНАМИЧЕСКИХ И ТЕКТОНОФИЗИЧЕСКИХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯХSHARED RESEARCH FACILITIES "SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS AND CONTROL OF NEAR-EARTH SPACE" ("THE ANGARA") AS APPLIED FOR GEODYNAMICS AND TECTONOPHYSICSЯсюкевичЮ. В.YasyukevichYu. V.

664033, Иркутск, ул. Лермонтова, 126а

126а Lermontov St, Irkutsk 664033

yasukevich@iszf.irk.ruВеснинА. М.VesninA. M.

664033, Иркутск, ул. Лермонтова, 126а

126а Lermontov St, Irkutsk 664033

Институт солнечно-земной физики СО РАНРоссияInstitute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Federation202217032022132593593Copyright © Ясюкевич Ю.В., Веснин А.М., 20222022Ясюкевич Ю.В., Веснин А.М.Yasyukevich Y.V., Vesnin A.M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.gt-crust.ru/jour/article/view/1415

В работе представлен экспериментальный комплекс центра коллективного пользования «Ангара» ИСЗФ СО РАН. Несмотря на то, что основное назначение инструментов – изучение околоземного космического пространства, часть инструментов может использоваться для проведения геодинамических исследований. Основное внимание уделено сибирской сети приемников сигналов глобальных навигационных спутниковых систем SibNet, включающей в настоящее время десять приемных пунктов. Также приведены некоторые сведения о том, в каких областях «негеодинамические» инструменты могут быть использованы при проведении мультидисциплинарных исследований литосферных процессов.

The paper considers an experimental complex of the Shared Research Facilities "The Angara" of ISTP SB RAS. Although the centre aims to study Near-Earth space, scientists could use some equipment for research in geodynamics. We mainly described the Siberian network of receivers of signals from global navigation satellite systems SibNet that currently includes ten receiving points. We also provide information on the fields where "non-geodynamic" equipment can be used for multidisciplinary studies of lithospheric processes.

центр коллективного пользованияGPSгеодинамикаионосферные эффектымультидисциплинарные исследованияShared Research FacilitiesGPSgeodynamicsionosphere effectsmultidisciplinary researchesРабота выполнена при финансовой поддержке Минобрнауки РФ, а также РФФИ и правительства Иркутской области, проект № 20-45-383010. В исследовании использованы данные ЦКП «Ангара» ИСЗФ СО РАН, Международной службы ГНСС (IGS), Государственной палаты по геопространственной информации Японии (GSI), Центра данных о физике космоса НАСА (база данных OMNI).The work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, RFBR and Government of the Irkutsk Region, project 20-45-383010. The study was based on data from the Shared Research Facilities "The Angara" of the ISTP SB RAS, International GNSS Service, Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, and OMNI Database.ReferencesAfraimovich E.L., Astafyeva E.I., 2008. TEC Anomalies – Local TEC Changes Prior to Earthquakes or TEC Response to Solar Activity Changes? Earth, Planets and Space 60, 961–966. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352851.Afraimovich E.L., Astafyeva E.I., 2008. TEC Anomalies – Local TEC Changes Prior to Earthquakes or TEC Response to Solar Activity Changes? Earth, Planets and Space 60, 961–966. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352851.Afraimovich E.L., Astafyeva E.I., Demyanov V.V., Edemskiy I.K., Gavrilyuk N.S., Ishin A.B., Kosogorov E.A., Leonovich L.A. et al., 2013. Review of GPS/GLONASS Studies of the Ionospheric Response to Natural and Anthropogenic Processes and Phenomena. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate 3, A27. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2013049.Afraimovich E.L., Astafyeva E.I., Demyanov V.V., Edemskiy I.K., Gavrilyuk N.S., Ishin A.B., Kosogorov E.A., Leonovich L.A. et al., 2013. Review of GPS/GLONASS Studies of the Ionospheric Response to Natural and Anthropogenic Processes and Phenomena. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate 3, A27. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2013049.Astafyeva E., Shalimov S., Olshanskaya E., Lognonné P., 2013. Ionospheric Response to Earthquakes of Different Magnitudes: Larger Quakes Perturb the Ionosphere Stronger and Longer. Geophysical Research Letters 40 (9), 1675–1681. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50398.Astafyeva E., Shalimov S., Olshanskaya E., Lognonné P., 2013. Ionospheric Response to Earthquakes of Different Magnitudes: Larger Quakes Perturb the Ionosphere Stronger and Longer. Geophysical Research Letters 40 (9), 1675–1681. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50398.Demyanov V.V., Yasyukevich Yu.V., 2021. Space Weather: Risk Factors for Global Navigation Satellite Systems. Solar-Terrestrial Physics 7 (2), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-72202104.Demyanov V.V., Yasyukevich Yu.V., 2021. Space Weather: Risk Factors for Global Navigation Satellite Systems. Solar-Terrestrial Physics 7 (2), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-72202104.Довбня Б.В., Пашинин А.Ю., Рахматулин Р.А. Краткосрочные электромагнитные предвестники землетрясений // Геодинамика и тектонофизика. 2019. Т. 10. № 3. С. 731–740. https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2019-10-3-0438.Dovbnya B.V., Pashinin A.Yu., Rakhmatulin R.A., 2019. Short-Term Electromagnetic Precursors of Earthquakes. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 10 (3), 731–740 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2019-10-3-0438.Duma G., Ruzhin Y., 2003. Diurnal Changes of Earthquake Activity and Geomagnetic Sq-Variations. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 3 (3/4), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-3-171-2003.Duma G., Ruzhin Y., 2003. Diurnal Changes of Earthquake Activity and Geomagnetic Sq-Variations. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 3 (3/4), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-3-171-2003.Love J.J., Thomas J.N., 2013. Insignificant Solar-Terrestrial Triggering of Earthquakes. Geophysical Research Letters 40 (6), 1165–1170, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50211.Love J.J., Thomas J.N., 2013. Insignificant Solar-Terrestrial Triggering of Earthquakes. Geophysical Research Letters 40 (6), 1165–1170, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50211.Perevalova N.P., Sankov V.A., Astafyeva E.I., Zhupityaeva А.S., 2014. Threshold Magnitude for Ionospheric TEC Response to Earthquakes. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 108, 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.12.014.Perevalova N.P., Sankov V.A., Astafyeva E.I., Zhupityaeva А.S., 2014. Threshold Magnitude for Ionospheric TEC Response to Earthquakes. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 108, 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.12.014.Pulinets S.A., 2011. The Synergy of Earthquake Precursors. Earthquake Science 24, 535–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-011-0815-1.Pulinets S.A., 2011. The Synergy of Earthquake Precursors. Earthquake Science 24, 535–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-011-0815-1.Pulinets S.A., Gaivoronska T.B., Leyva Contreras A., Ciraolo L., 2004. Correlation Analysis Technique Revealing Ionospheric Precursors of Earthquakes. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 4, 697–702. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00299217.Pulinets S.A., Gaivoronska T.B., Leyva Contreras A., Ciraolo L., 2004. Correlation Analysis Technique Revealing Ionospheric Precursors of Earthquakes. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 4, 697–702. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00299217.Rapoport Yu., Grimalsky V., Krankowski A., Pulinets S., Fedorenko A., Petrishchevskii S., 2020. Algorithm for Modeling Electromagnetic Channel of Seismo-Ionospheric Coupling (SIC) and the Variations in the Electron Concentration. Acta Geophysica 68, 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-019-00385-0.Rapoport Yu., Grimalsky V., Krankowski A., Pulinets S., Fedorenko A., Petrishchevskii S., 2020. Algorithm for Modeling Electromagnetic Channel of Seismo-Ionospheric Coupling (SIC) and the Variations in the Electron Concentration. Acta Geophysica 68, 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-019-00385-0.Weber G., Dettmering D., Gebhard H., 2005. Networked Transport of RTCM via Internet Protocol (NTRIP). In: F. Sansò (Ed.), A Window on the Future of Geodesy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p. 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27432-4_11.Weber G., Dettmering D., Gebhard H., 2005. Networked Transport of RTCM via Internet Protocol (NTRIP). In: F. Sansò (Ed.), A Window on the Future of Geodesy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p. 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27432-4_11.Yasyukevich Yu.V., Vesnin A.M., Perevalova N.P., 2018. SibNet – Siberian Global Navigation Satellite System Network: Current State. Solar-Terrestrial Physics 4 (4), 63–72. http://doi.org/10.12737/stp-44201809.Yasyukevich Yu.V., Vesnin A.M., Perevalova N.P., 2018. SibNet – Siberian Global Navigation Satellite System Network: Current State. Solar-Terrestrial Physics 4 (4), 63–72. http://doi.org/10.12737/stp-44201809.Yasyukevich Y.V., Zakharov V.I., Kunitsyn V.E., Voeikov S.V., 2015. The Response of the Ionosphere to the Earthquake in Japan on March 11, 2011 as Estimated by Different GPSBased Methods. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 55, 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793214060218.Yasyukevich Y.V., Zakharov V.I., Kunitsyn V.E., Voeikov S.V., 2015. The Response of the Ionosphere to the Earthquake in Japan on March 11, 2011 as Estimated by Different GPSBased Methods. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 55, 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793214060218.Zherebtsov G.A. (Ed.), 2012. Seismoionospheric and Seismoelectromagnetic Processes in the Baikal Rift Zone. Integration Projects of SB RAS. Iss. 35. Publishing House of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 304 p. (in Russian).Zherebtsov G.A. (Ed.), 2012. Seismoionospheric and Seismoelectromagnetic Processes in the Baikal Rift Zone. Integration Projects of SB RAS. Iss. 35. Publishing House of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 304 p. (in Russian).Zherebtsov G.A., 2020. Complex of Heliogeophysical Instruments of New Generation. Solar-Terrestrial Physics 6 (2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-62202001.Zherebtsov G.A., 2020. Complex of Heliogeophysical Instruments of New Generation. Solar-Terrestrial Physics 6 (2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-62202001.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.